Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Yeitzer HaRa Just *Loves* When You Think He Isn't Looking

Now that I have retired, I have more time to learn, Baruch HaShem. I have kept my schedule the same, except now I go to kollel in the morning with my backpack, instead of to work. They say (you know, them...) that preparing a schedule of goals and activities is probably more important than the financial preparation. With rabbinic counsel, I have added the following to my daily seder: gemara, halacha, navi. For gemara, I have gone back to the beginning and am learning masechta Brachos with Rashi and the Rosh. For halacha, I am learning meat and milk. For navi, Yeshayahu. I figured with eight-ish more hours a day, I would just be sailing through. Not quite.

I have, of course, learned gemara for some time. This is just review, right? No... This time I have two new aims. First, not only understand what the gemara is saying according to Rashi, but also working on why Rashi chose that way to explain the gemara; that is, to learn Rashi as a rishon as well as using him as a mentor. The Rosh highlights the halachically and philosophically important conclusions. Here's an example of the latter.

Chazal (Brachos 33b) contrast two baraisos in the context of the שליח ציבור/prayer leader davening; one says that a person who repeats is disgraceful, the other says take him down and get someone else to lead davening. (Remember, in those days there were no siddurim, so the שליח ציבור/prayer leader was actually being the agent or the congregation and enabling them to fulfill their obligation. The gemara resolves the apparent contradiction by adding context: If he repeats words, that's just disgraceful; but if he repeats a whole verse, then take him down. Rashi explains that repeating words just turns t'filah into a joking/light-headed activity; which is disgraceful. Repeating verses, though, looks like he is praising/accepting two different gods and he is speaking to each one separately. That one you take down.

The Rosh says that is why we say the verse of שמע ישראל (which Google Translate translates as "Shema Yisrael" ☺) only once at the conclusion of Yom Kippur. The statement of ...ברוך שם כבוד is not a verse, so no worries about repeating. The verse of  ה' הוא האלוקים is a verse, but the prophet repeats it himself, so that is ok.

Now let's put Rashi and the Rosh together. At the end of Yom Kippur -- the one day of the year where the Yetzer HaRa has no authority and is off duty -- after 25 hours of fasting, 10 confessional services, prayers and supplications for t'shuva and forgiveness, all of which comes on the heels of the 10 days of repentance.... After all that, we are worried that someone might have fleeting thought of avoda zara while saying שמע ישראל ה' אלוקינו, ה' אחד! Why?

Because the Yetzer HaRa is now back on duty and he takes his job very seriously. Don't blink.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...