Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Egytians Were So Woke; They Would Rather Die Than Believe in Hashem

There is a famous drash about the timing of the 10th plague, the slaying of the first born. Moshe tells Paroh (Shmos 11:4): Thus says HaShem: כחצות הלילה/at midnight, I shall go out.... Chazal note the change from how the actual event is described (Shmos 12:29): It was בחצי הלילה/at midnight... Both בחצי הלילה and כחצות הלילה mean exactly at midnight. The description of the event uses a phrase that means "at the middle of the night", whereas Moshe's proclamation to Paroh means "when the night is divided" (see Rashi and ArtScroll on both). Nonetheless, since the כ as a prefix can mean "approximately", Chazal tell us that Moshe used that term so that the Egyptians would understand it is "about midnight". Why? Lest Paroh's astrologers/scientists err and get the time wrong by a few seconds and say that Moshe made a mistake.

Cool. However, the Torah tells us (Shmos 12:31) that there was not an Egyptian house without a corpse. So many firstborns? No... see Rashi who explains: (1) The word בכור/firstborn can also sometimes mean oldest or most important. (2) The Egyptian women were not faithful to their relationships, and there could be four or five firstborns in the house, from her pool-boys, gardeners, etc. In fact the Egyptians (Shmos 12:33) rushed the Jews out because they were worried that a lot more than firstborns were dying. What happened to being worried about even a miscalculation of a few seconds?! This seems much worse, no?

No; it's not worse at all. Egypt was a very woke society. I once heard a comedian who had worked as a high school teacher. She said, "This generation will respect your pronouns, but they won't respect you as a person." The Egyptians were not about to let Moshe tell them that they had to believe in his One True G-d. Oh no... You can't tell me what to believe! The problem with the scientific calculations being off by a few seconds was not a matter of not believing that people were going to die. The issue is that they wanted to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Moshe was not speaking for HaShem. They wanted and needed fervently to believe that Moshe was doing magic, or knew something about science that they didn't... anything but actually believe there was a Creator and that He cared what was going on in this world.

The problem with lots of people dying besides the apparent firstborn? Not a problem; they knew their wives and they knew themselves and they knew their society. They certainly knew that their marriage vows were anything but sacred. That's why they didn't know who else might die... no one knew. Actually, the fact that those children that didn't look like them were dying was actually chilling proof that Moshe was speaking for HaShem. So they hustled the Jews out as fast as they could.

Death? Suffering? No problem... That is the human condition. Believe in a Loving Creator who cares deeply about those who love Him? Oh no, no, no....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...