Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Wait! מחלוקת is *THAT* Bad?!

Yes, I know מחלוקת is bad. We all know know that מחלוקת is bad. But is it really? It's not like murder, or avoda zara, or immorality, right? Right?

Let's check that out. First, there was the sin of the golden calf. A distressingly dark blotch in the history of Klal Yisrael. It is clear from the narrative in parshas Ki Sisa that Aaron helped in the construction of said idol . The Torah tells us (Sh'mos 32:2) that Aaron asked them to bring earrings from the women and children. Rashi brings a medrash to explain his plan:

Aaron said to himself, “The women and children are fond of their jewelry. Perhaps the matter will be delayed, and in the meantime, Moses will arrive.”

So: (1) that plan didn't work; and (2) Aaron was delaying and working as slowly and lazily as possible, but he was working to build an idol. R' Biderman brings a Chasam Sofer to explain why he participated at all:

The Chasam Sofer zt'l answers that Aharon understood that if he refused the nation and didn't help them make the egel, there would be מחלוקת. Aaron preferred the sin of avodah zarah over the even greater sin of מחלוקת.

Wait, what? And that's not all. Near the end of parashas Mattos (Bamidbar, chapter 32), the leaders of the tribes of Reuven and Gad come to Moshe Rabeinu to say that because of their abundant flocks, the would prefer to not go into Eretz Yisroel as they have found some better real estate. Moshe Rabeinu tries to dissuade them, but at pasuk 33 finally agrees. The Sforno says why: In order to avoid entering into a מחלוקת, Moshe agreed to their request.

Ok, ok... but that all happened a long time ago. We have our own pressures nowadays, right? R' Biderman told a story about R' Nissi Karelitz, ztz"l; modern day posek and nephew of the Chazon Ish. R' Karelitz was once walking in the streets of Bnei Brak with a friend when he was approached by a neighbor. The neighbor said that R' Karelitz owed him money. The painter that R' Karelitz had hired to paint his apartment had spilled some paint down the pipes and caused a blockage in his (the neighbor's) pipes. The neighbor said he had to call a plumber and it cost him 600 NIS (about $160, give or take). R' Nissim took out his wallet and paid the neighbor on the spot. As R' Karelitz continued walking with his friend, he said, "There were three reasons I didn't owe him that money. First, a little paint down the pipes is not going to cause a blockage. Second, he lives on the other side of the building from me; our pipes are nowhere near each other. Third, I haven't had my apartment painted recently." His friend was shocked and couldn't understand why the renown posek had paid the money that he didn't owe. R' Karelitz explained simply, "It was worth it to avoid מחלוקת with my neighbor."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...