Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Scourge of Machklokes

As of this writing we are on the brink of bringing in Tammuz, 5784. We are less than three weeks from The Three Weeks. We are, I am sad to say, tracking to commemorate another year of this long diaspora and loss of our Beis HaMikdash. The Aguda has published a video interview with Dayan Aharon Dovid Dunner, shlita: The Scourge of Machklokes: Fights, Divorces, and the Pursuit of Shalom

I highly recommend you watch it in its entirety. There was one point the dayan made, however, that really struck me. It is such simple advice, and something that can easily be made a part of your life. At 12:41 the dayan begins saying over the famous story of how R' Yisrael Salanter was galvanized into action to create the mussar movement.

There was a simple shoemaker who earned a respectable living. One day he received news that he had come into a lot of money (either a lottery or an inheritance from a wealthy distant relative; not really an important detail). This simple shoemaker was immediately launched into the upper echelons of society. He built a big house, dressed his family in the best clothing, etc. He was still honest, but no longer needed to be among the working class. There were those in town who were jealous and looked down on this nouveau-riche family. It came time to make a chasuna and this shoemaker went all out. As he was walking his daughter to the chupa, one of the jealous townspeople came running over with a bag in his hand. In front of everyone he opened the bag, took out an old pair of shoes, and said, "Nu? Can you have these ready for me before Shabbos?" Imagine the embarrassment of this ex-shoemaker. Imagine the shame his daughter felt. Imagine the machlokes that erupted across the crowd; everyone taking sides.

At 14:12, the dayan, speaking softly, says: The velt says that R' Yisrael Salanter was so upset that someone could do that, so he was inspired to start the mussar movement. But the יודעי דעת/insightful say differently. The one who brought the shoes to embarrass the family is disgraceful and will likely remain disgraceful. People like that don't read mussar s'farim. It was the (ex)shoemaker that R' Yisrael wanted to educate. Yes, ignore the rude guest; he doesn't deserve your attention. Just let it go. (You can find another version of this story and lesson here.)

Here's my take away: Next time you are in a situation that could lead to a machlokes, just look the person in the eye and say, 

Listen here! You know the lesson that Dayan Dunner said we should learn. Do you always have to have the last word? Do you always have to be right? Can't you just give in this once? What will it cost you?
Oh wait! I left out an important detail (another common cause of machlokes): You need to be looking in the mirror when you make that speech.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...