Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: How Much Can You Rely on Hashem? As Much as You Rely on Hashem

I volunteer a few hours each month at the ChesedChicago food co-op, which helps families in our community get kosher food at wholesale prices. They asked me to volunteer because of my advanced computer skills, which I use to update a spreadsheet that calculates their total. Someone else handles the actual payments, of course. Want to volunteer yourself? Check out opportunities at ChesedChicago.

Last time I was there, I had the merit to help R' Efraim Twerski and I mentioned that I had not seen shiurim from him on TorahAnytime.com recently. I will take some credit, therefore, for his more recent post on Bitachon for Everyone. He started with an interesting conversation with a Jew who lives in another town who is a member of a shul that is quite Modern Orthodox. (R' Twerski said that as much as he doesn't like to label people, here it fits.) The man told him that they had five levels of security at the shul. Including, but not limited to, 65 closed circuit cameras to which all members of the shul have 24/? access via an app and also an armed guard. He asked R' Twerski what kind of security his shul here in Chicago has. R' Twerski replied, "We have mezuzos."

Of course, when I say things like that, I get eye-rolling and more. This, though, was R' Twerski; the man had enough derech eretz to just say, "Rabbi, the protection from mezusos only goes so far." Over Yom Tom, R' Twerski gave a shiur or two about ביטחון/reliance on HaShem. Apparently the message didn't get received with much depth. That wasn't surprising to me. However, R' Twerski went on to say that perhaps the man was not completely wrong. Why? Because you can really only rely on HaShem as much as you rely on HaShem. You should definitely listen to R' Twerski's shiur, but I'll tell you how I understand that point.

Of course HaShem runs the world down to the tiniest detail. However, from our human (and therefore limited) perspective, we experience two kinds of השגחה/Divine Providence: פרטית/personalized and כללית/general. Essentially, things like squirrels are directed by  השגחה כללית; HaShem wants thousands of squirrels to run around our neighborhoods, but doesn't really care (from our perspective) which squirrel runs up which tree. At the opposite end of the spectrum is how the world is run for the צדיקים גמורים/completely righteous. They see direct supervision, השגחה פרטית, at every turn. How do these two world views co-exist?

The Rambam writes that a family may have money for generations so that one צדיק will be able to take shelter under the eaves of their mansion during a rainstorm. The צדיק will see the rain starting and thank HaShem for providing him with the few minutes of shelter that he needs. That צדיק sees a world run very efficiently and with benevolence. How likely, though, are the people in the house to think that that their success is for that צדיק? They are going to rely on their own business acumen and attribute all success to themselves. They see a world of random events that they are able to navigate for their own advantage.

It's really up to you. The more you rely on HaShem -- which means you accept and execute your obligations -- the more you will see HaShem's השגחה/Divine Providence and therefore the more you can rely on it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...