Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Remember Why You are Here

From R' Meilach Biderman: They built this campus with four buildings. One had several floors of rooms for sleeping. Another was a grand dining hall. The third was a beautiful beis midrash. Last, but not least, a gymnasium. Only one thing was missing: They hadn't put up a sign to say whether it was a resort or a yeshiva. What's the difference? They both need the same structures. The only difference is attitude. In a yeshiva, the beis medrash is the focus of everything. Of course, to learn and daven well, you need to stay healthy; that means eating healthy, keeping fit, and getting enough rest. But a resort? The focus for some is the dining hall, for others the sleeping quarters, for others it is the gymnasium. Of course there has to be a beis medrash; after all, they'll want to daven in the morning, maybe catch a mincha and ma'ariv. Some will even grab a quick daf for the day.

R' Meilach said this world is that campus -- it has everything, but HaShem didn't put a sign on it. It is up to each and every Jew to decide if they are in a resort or a yeshiva.

That would be a good finish, don't you think? You may want to take this opportunity to move on to your next email or blog post. I respect that.

I have something pretty cool to share with you now; I agree the connection to the vort from R' Meilach might be a bit of a stretch, but I think it is worth considering.

There are some troublesome points in the retelling of the conversation between the snake and Eve on that fateful afternoon. The snake -- to start a conversation -- asked Eve if HaShem had really forbidden them to eat from any of the trees in the garden. (Bereishis 3:1; by free translation.) Eve responded (3:2), we do eat from the trees of the garden. Eve then added (3:3), but one tree -- right in the middle of the garden -- HaShem said that we are not allowed to eat from it nor even touch it lest we die.

Eve's responses are puzzling. Let's start from the end and work our way backwards "Lest we die"?! HaShem was very clear that on the very day they ate they would bring death into the world. "Don't even touch it"?! That seems to be a complete fabrication. And now when you look back at her first response, you'll see that she didn't mention HaShem at all. "We eat fruits from the trees." Eve seems to paint HaShem as just telling them what not to do; but other than that they have free reign.

Look at the Ohr Chaim HaKodesh and you'll see a very cool explanation for "don't touch" and "lest". They were worried that since anointing is tantamount to drinking and eating (Shabbos 86), maybe just touching the fruit and getting the juice on their skin could also be fatal. So of course they didn't want to touch, because maybe that would also bring death into the world. Cool! So they were making -- so to speak -- rabbinic decrees to keep them distant from transgressing! What could be wrong.

And this is my tie into the resort vs yeshiva. If they were looking at the world as a yeshiva -- a place to grow close to HaShem and so HaShem is at the center of everything you do -- then she would have said, "we don't touch the tree lest we come to eat from the fruit". That is, the fence would have been to keep them from transgressing. Instead, though -- as evidenced from 3:2, the main thing is they can eat from all the trees according to their own desires -- they viewed the world as a resort. Of course, then, you don't want to even touch the poison ivy; it will ruin your vacation.

Well... I guess I can end this with: We live in this wonderful world -- it has everything we need and could want, but HaShem didn't put a sign on it. It is up to each and every Jew to decide if they are in a resort or a yeshiva. A place to come to die peacefully, or to live vibrantly.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...