Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Coolest Cookie Recipe -- What's the Bracha?

My wife is, bli ayin hara, an amazing baker. She is the Bubbie about whom the other girls in my granddaughter's bunk in summer camp said, "Oh wow! You brought some of your Bubbie's cookies!?"

Today she made the best cookies ever. They are gluten free and delicious. That's not what makes them -- for me, anyway -- the best cookies ever. These cookies are made with almond flour, rolled oats, pumpkin pie filling, and egg, some vanilla, and oil. I only know that because I needed to know what bracha to make. Here are the issues.

First, rolled oats are "borei pri ha'adama". Cooked oats, on the other hand, are "borei minei m'zonos". Almond flour, pumpkin pie filling, and oil are all, of course, "she'ha'kol". The overwhelming majority of of the cookie (Pumpkin Oatmeal Cookies; but substitute almond flour for the real flour) volume is from "she'ha'kol" ingredients. Normally that would mean that the bracha on the cookie is "she'ha'kol" and afterwards a "borei nefashos". But the five grains (when cooked) are special -- as long as they are included for their taste (and not just as a binder), then the resulting food gets their bracha of "borei minei m'zonos".

The question here, then, whether the liquid -- no water, all "mei peiros" -- and heat are sufficient to break down the starch in the oats enough to transform them from a "borei pri ha'adama" to a "borei minei m'zonos"? Let's say it is. But are there enough oats to stick together in that amount of other stuff. And does it matter if they actually stick together or does it only depend on whether they would stick together if there was enough of them. (I can attest that the look and feel and taste of separate/lonely little oats in a sea of delicious/soft/sticky cookie. Yum.) Because if there is, then the whole cookie goes from  to "she'ha'kol" (the bracha of the majority) to "borei minei m'zonos" (the bracha of the special case). There is no water, but there is both oil and whatever moisture is in pumpkin pie filling.

So let's say you are stuck with an honest doubt. No worries, just always have some "she'ha'kol" and a cracker before eating the cookies. But suppose you don't have any of that; you just have that one delicious cookie and you are really hungry. Now what? While it is true that both "borei minei m'zonos" and "she'ha'kol" work for any food after the fact; the "borei minei m'zonos" is harder to justify (it does not cover water and salt, for example). So when the cookie dust settles... you would be better off making a "she'ha'kol". (Personally I lean toward thinking the oats are cooked enough anyway, but I'm planning to only eat them after crackers and something "she'ha'kol" (not water, since if you are only drinking the water to exempt cover something else, maybe the water doesn't get it's own "she'ha'kol").

Afterward, though, I will definitely make a "borei nefashos" since I am not likely to eat enough cookies at one sitting to consume a whole k'zayis of oats. And even though we sometimes look at they volume of the whole cookie (like chocolate chip cookies), since there is some doubt and the majority ingredients are most certainly not "borei minei m'zonos" material; in this case I'll make  a "borei nefashos".

Two final comments: (1) hilchos brachos is so fun; (2) after all this, I am thinking the appropriate way to get the "she'ha'kol" is with a schnaptz (please; not sherry cask...)

L'Chaim!

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...
Post a Comment
Read more