Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Majority and Halachic Presumption

Here's a fact: Approximately 10% of dairy cows are treifos ((gleaned from the OU web article, Milk from a Possibly Treif Cow). Here's another fact: the milk from a treif animal is treif. One more: By strict Torah law, in a mixture of like kosher and non-kosher liquids, the non-kosher component is nullified by a simple majority. By rabbinic decree, though, we require the familiar nullification by one part in 60. Putting that together, we seem to come to the following obviously erroneous conclusion: Since 10% of dairy cows are treifos and milk from a treif cow is itself treif, and all or our large dairy farms mix milk from many cows in many herds, so the milk in any one bottle is composed of 90% kosher milk and 10% treif milk, since 10% is much higher than one in 60; conclusion: it is forbidden by rabbinic decree to drink any milk from a large dairy farm.

How do I know that conclusion is obviously erroneous? Simply because the OU, OK, Star-K, CRC, and a whole slew of other kosher certification agencies say the milk is fine. Those agencies have armies of experts who also know the above facts, and yet have come to the conclusion that the milk is 100% kosher. What did we do wrong?

I'll explain it they way I heard in a shiur from R' Yosef Greenwald (to the best of my understanding, but any mistakes are mine).

First, some background. In general, רוב beats חזקה, but that requires some explanation because of the following halacha. Suppose Shimon buys an ox from Reuvein. A couple of days later, Shimon returns demanding a full refund. What's the problem? The ox is incorrigible and cannot be used to pull a plow. Reuvein responds, "I thought you wanted it for a nice meal. If you had told me you wanted an ox for ploughing, I would have sold you a nice well mannered ox. I still can, if you like." Shimon, having just learned about רוב and חזקה says, "Ha! Most animals in this area are purchased for ploughing, not eating. You may have my money, and therefore have a חזקה, but I have רוב  on my side, so I win." They go to beis din, the dayan rules in favor or Reuvein. Since it is a case of uncertainty in monetary matters, the rule is (almost) always, whoever wants to take the money from its current owner has the burden of proof.

Wait, wait, wait... רוב is enough to kill someone (case of son, heaven forbid, hitting his father), but not enough to extract money? So here's the deal: As discussed in the first TftD on this topic, רוב tells us a definitive status; that is, it can prevent an uncertainty from every arising. That's precisely why רוב tells of that this person is his son; there was no doubt from the get go. Most married women don't have affairs, so there is no reason to even entertain that this might not be his son; the boy is definately (unless otherwise proven with kosher witnesses) his son. This ox, though, is no longer part of a majority; we have a real doubt as to where he belongs. In that case, חזקה decides; and it would take another (stronger) חזקה (or, of course, kosher witnesses or an explicit contract) to beat that.

Back to our dairy. Most (~90% or so) dairy cows are not treifos. Therefore, any particular cow we choose is categorized as kosher, as that what רוב tells us. Just as halacha dictates that the boy is definitely his son; so, too, the halacha dictates that this cow is definitely kosher. Therefore the milk from that cow is definitely kosher. Since the milk from each cow is definitely kosher, all the milk produced from that farm is kosher. Enjoy your Cheerios/Wheaties/Cap'n Crunch, what have you.

This is an interesting "quirk", if you will of halacha. Each case is decided on its own merits and not on statistical analysis after the fact.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...