Catchy title, no? If you were a physicist, you'd be deeply amused by my wittiness. If you are not, you can at least be amused at how witty I think I am being.
Here is the core issue: We humans are the unique beings in Creation who have unencumbered free will. That is, in fact, what the Torah means when it says that man was created in the image of his Creator. (I am oversimplifying a bit; but really just a bit.) The question is whether we can each make our own decisions independently, or do they need to mesh together?
Be that as it may, we should be able to see what how are Sages viewed this question by looking at different events in the Torah and see how they explain them. Since we are being dramatic, lets look at the first murder in the history of Creation: Kayin murdering his brother Hevel. The Torah records that HaShem admonished Kayin (B'reishis 4:1) and tells him, "the bloods of your brother (דְּמֵ֣י אָחִ֔יךָ) cry out to Me". Why the "bloods" in plural? Rashi, in his first explanation says it means the blood of Hevel and all his future descendants. Aha! If there are potential descendants to cry out, then his death was preordained for this moment! (I heard that דיוק just this last Shabbos from R' Doniel Lehrfeld, Rosh Yeshivah Beis Yisrael. Very, very g'shmack!) So we have clear evidence of entanglement.
I spoke to the rosh yeshiva the next day and noted that Rashi gives a second explanation. Namely, that Kayin didn't know which blow would be the fatal one (being the first murderer, after all), so he stabbed Kayin several times to ensure that at least one blow would be the fatal one. Why does Rashi need a second explanation? Exactly our machlokes: according to those who hold there is no entanglement, there were never going to be future generations. The rosh yeshiva was not displeased with my הערה.
In any case (and this was actually the main point that R' Lehrfeld wanted to make): We must take very seriously that our actions -- both positive and negative -- can and do have a profound effect on others,. We will certainly have to stand to answer the accusations created by our own actions.
Here is the core issue: We humans are the unique beings in Creation who have unencumbered free will. That is, in fact, what the Torah means when it says that man was created in the image of his Creator. (I am oversimplifying a bit; but really just a bit.) The question is whether we can each make our own decisions independently, or do they need to mesh together?
I should note at this point that free will is not anarchy; if I decide to jump up, I am going to follow a relatively ballistic trajectory until I land. I can't decide at the apex of my trajectory to change directions or just hover; my trajectory is a consequence of -- and therefore an integral part of -- my initial decision.The most dramatic way to phrase this question is: If Bob murders George, has Bob's free will choice of murder just interfered with George's free choice (in this case, by preventing George from making any more choices at all), or was George already destined to die in just that way at just that moment? It is crucial to note at this point, that Bob is just as much a murderer in either case. George's destiny is not a factor in Bob's guilt or innocence. This question is, therefore, almost entirely philosophical and it is very difficult indeed to cook up a case where it would make a practical or empirical difference.
Be that as it may, we should be able to see what how are Sages viewed this question by looking at different events in the Torah and see how they explain them. Since we are being dramatic, lets look at the first murder in the history of Creation: Kayin murdering his brother Hevel. The Torah records that HaShem admonished Kayin (B'reishis 4:1) and tells him, "the bloods of your brother (דְּמֵ֣י אָחִ֔יךָ) cry out to Me". Why the "bloods" in plural? Rashi, in his first explanation says it means the blood of Hevel and all his future descendants. Aha! If there are potential descendants to cry out, then his death was preordained for this moment! (I heard that דיוק just this last Shabbos from R' Doniel Lehrfeld, Rosh Yeshivah Beis Yisrael. Very, very g'shmack!) So we have clear evidence of entanglement.
I spoke to the rosh yeshiva the next day and noted that Rashi gives a second explanation. Namely, that Kayin didn't know which blow would be the fatal one (being the first murderer, after all), so he stabbed Kayin several times to ensure that at least one blow would be the fatal one. Why does Rashi need a second explanation? Exactly our machlokes: according to those who hold there is no entanglement, there were never going to be future generations. The rosh yeshiva was not displeased with my הערה.
In any case (and this was actually the main point that R' Lehrfeld wanted to make): We must take very seriously that our actions -- both positive and negative -- can and do have a profound effect on others,. We will certainly have to stand to answer the accusations created by our own actions.
Comments