Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Halacha and Medrash/Using Metal Knives for Circumcision

I was talking to a cardiac/thoracic surgeon recently. I mentioned that I had worked in a radiation oncology department as a physicist doing treatment planning. I wanted to be empathetic to the stress he must feel and said I had woken up a few times at night worried that I had made a mistake. He gave me sort of a blank stare and said, "I don't make mistakes."

Ah. Well, I do make mistakes. I know that other people also make mistakes. How do I know? There is a whole body of Jewish law on what to do when one has omitted a necessary insertion. For example, forgetting "r'tzei" in bentching on Shabbos. The truth is, though, I know people who need the opposite. They so rarely eat bread during the week that "r'tzei" seems like an integral part of bentching. For those people, I offer another halacha: when bentching during the week, you should first take all knives off the table. (Yes, even butter/table knives.) On Shabbos, though, those can remain on the table. Why? Because a Jewish table is essentially a private altar and our meal is essentially a private offering. The Torah forbids using iron tools in the building of the altar in the Beis HaMikdash, and so the Jewish nation has accepted on themselves the custom to remove all knives from our table when saying grace after a bread meal.

Why does the Torah forbid using iron tools in the building of the altar? The philosophical works say it is because the altar's reason for being is to lengthen life, whereas as iron instruments' (swords and the like) reason for being is to shorten life. Why don't we worry about knives on Shabbos? Since it is forbidden to build on Shabbos, it is not relevant to worry about the tools used to build it. (I know there are other reasons given. This is the most straightforward and the one I need for this TftD.)

That being the case... doesn't it seem odd that we use a metal (stainless/hardened/tempered/high-carbon/etc steel, which is iron) scalpel for bris milah? Nor is this a new thing; we have used metal knives for the bris milah for millennia. To make the question even stronger, please note that we have precisely one depiction of bris milah in our Holy Scripture that specifies the knife material used. The Torah tells us that when Zipporah circumcised her son, she used a flint knife. (Sh'mos 4:25) Isn't that interesting? (By the way, the poskim use this in the discussions of not only what materials can be used for the knife, but also who is fit to perform the ritual.)

Why in the world, then, would we prefer a steel knife over all others? (Don't try to tell me it is because that's easiest. If there is one thing that almost never figures into halacha, it is expediency.) I heard an amazing medrash. When Dovid (not yet) haMelech was on the battlefield with Goliath, he took his trusty sling shot and flung a stone toward Goliath's head. Goliath, of course, was in full armor -- even more than a usual soldier (see the account in Shmuel I, 17 for all the gory details). Goliath was wearing an iron helmet that protected even his forehead. The stone approached and said to the helmet, "Let me through! I come to kill this evil person." The iron in the helmet responded, "Why should I yield to you?" The stone persisted, "I come for the victory of the Jewish people and to sanctify HaShem's name!" The iron responded, "I will therefore yield, but on one condition -- henceforth the Jewish nation will perform the bris mila with an iron blade." The stone agreed, the iron yielded, Goliath was killed, the career of Dovid -- who would be king -- was launched... and we now use steel knives to circumcise our boys.

There is so much here... custom vs מוסר/ethics, halacha vs medrash, conversations and deals made by inanimate materials. All that and more; each of which could be the topic of several TftDs (and many have). One thing, though... this is just so cool!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...