Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Transgress and Live -OR- Stand Firm and Die

Here's the joke: Moshe was called to pay a visit to the local (non-Jewish) mayor, and old friend who was now a powerful(ish) politician. When Moshe got there, the mayor was eating and asked Moshe if he would care to join him. "I must decline, Mr. Mayor, as the food is not kosher," said Moshe. After eating, the mayor poured himself some wine, again offering the same to Moshe. "I must decline again, Mr. Mayor, as the wine is not kosher," replied Moshe. "My goodness!", said the mayor, "So many rules! What if that is the only thing to eat and you are starving?!" "Ah," said Moshe, "if our like is at risk, then we are allowed -- even required -- to eat whatever will save our life." The mayor suddenly pulled a revolver from under the table and ordered Moshe, "Drink a glass of wine or I shall shoot you dead!" Moshe quickly quaffed a glass of wine. "Another!", roared the glaring mayor. Moshe complied with all haste. The mayor then put down the gun and started laughing at his little "joke". Moshe was furious! The mayor tried to calm him, "Please, old friend. It was just a little joke. Don't be angry with me." Moshe, still furious, replied, "And you couldn't have started your joke when the food was still out!?"

Here's the well know rule: There are only three sins for which a Jew must give up his life rather than transgress: (1) Publicly serving a false god. (2) גילוי עריות/certain narrowly defined sexual behaviors. (3) Murder. Why is he not required to give up his life rather than transgress other sins? Because the Torah says (Leviticus 18:5): וָחַ֣י בָּהֶ֑ם/live by them (the mitzvos of the Torah). Given that, why is not one allowed to transgress those three? Ok, so that's tricky.

In another place it says (Leviticus 22:32): וְנִ֨קְדַּשְׁתִּ֔י בְּת֖וֹךְ בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל/I (HaShem) shall be sanctified amidst the Jewish people. From there we clearly see that publicly serving a false god is not allowed. Why גילוי עריות? Because the Torah likens the rape of woman to murder. Why murder? Here our Sages offer a penetrating insight to our place in this world: How do you know who's blood is redder? Rashi explains that to mean that it is impossible to know whose life is more precious to HaShem.

Really? REALLY? Are you seriously telling me that if Moshe Rabbeinu had been captured by heathens and told that they would execute him unless he killed Korach or Dassan or Aviram, that Moshe Rabbeinu would have been required to allow himself to be killed rather than murder those evildoers? Yes. What happened to וָחַ֣י בָּהֶ֑ם/live by them? Interestingly, that is permission to transgress, not an imperative. On the other hand, וְנִ֨קְדַּשְׁתִּ֔י בְּת֖וֹךְ בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל is an imperative to sanctify the name/reputation of HaShem in this world. Every single Jew has that opportunity, and no human can judge the intensity of the sanctification.

In a horrifying situation like that, regardless of the decision, a Jew is going to leave the world. The imperative of וְנִ֨קְדַּשְׁתִּ֔י בְּת֖וֹךְ בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל will be compromised, the permission of  וָחַ֣י בָּהֶ֑ם doesn't kick in; transgressing the prohibition of murder is not an option. Suppose one Jew could save another by taking his own life. That would also not be permitted. Just as your blood is not redder than his, his is not redder than yours.

Because this world has a Creator, everything -- every Jew, every human, every animal, every plant, every planet, every star, every single atom -- is here by His Will and is here for a purpose. The Jewish nation -- which means each and every Jew -- chose to define itself as the nation who accepted the Torah. That acceptance makes each and every one of us a partner in the creation. We live by the Torah and we die by the Torah, because we are integrally intertwined with the Torah and our Creator.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...