Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Deep Hypocrisy Revealed by Those Who Espouse "Freedom of Religion"

I'll be real up front here: I absolutely do not believe you have a right to believe that π = 3. I am not even apologetic about my dogmatism on this issue. I don't really care what you say you believe, any more than I care what you say is your favorite color or flavor of ice cream. Those aren't beliefs, those are opinions and personal preferences. It would be horribly presumptuous of me to make any statement at all about your personal preferences and opinions.

How about another one: I do not believe you have to right to believe that the earth is flat. The earth is not a flat plate sitting on the back of a turtle. No amount of consideration for your feelings nor appreciation of your rights is going to change the facts. The earth is not flat, π does not equal three; if you really believe they are, then you are nut job. That doesn't make you a bad person, I wouldn't restrict where you can live or whom you can marry. You're still a nut job.

There are really three things happening in that last statement whose distinctions are woefully blurred. Let's clarify: we have fact, belief, and opinions. First: I have an opinion that those who believe that the earth is not flat or that π does not equal three. My opinion can't be right or wrong; it's just my opinion. The flatness (or lack thereof) of the earth and the value of π are facts; they are whatever they are, and my knowledge of their value does not affect their value. Finally, I believe -- based on evidence and logical arguments -- that the earth is not flat and that π does not equal 3. My opinions are my own, the facts are whatever they are; beliefs is where our world's collide.

I don't really care how sincere Joe Bob is in his belief that the world is flat and that π = 3; they aren't. I can't allow Joe Bob to build structures based on his belief that π = 3, because they would represent a danger to the public. I can't let Job Bob's mistaken belief that the earth is flat affect public policy. He doesn't believe in communication satellites orbiting in geosynchronous orbit; that's his problem and I cannot and will not allow it to impede progress.

One more step before we get to the punch line. I cannot actually show Joe Bob a π and say, "See!  It's not equal to three! It's an irrational number that begins 3.141592653589793..." (Here's a sad aside: I didn't need to look that up; I have π memorized to 15 decimal places. Not for a contest or anything, just because it's something I thought I should know.) I can must all sorts of very tight logical arguments, but at the end of the day, Joe Bob may very well say, "I see you are sincere and that you really believe everything you are saying. I also can't find the logical error in your thought process; but I know you are wrong."

Whether or not there is a Creator is a fact. My belief and other's non-belief does not affect His existence (or, G-d forbid lack thereof). I can't point to Him, but I have all sorts of very tight logical arguments that have led me to the beliefs I have. As the end of the day, you may very well say, "I see you are sincere and that you really believe everything you are saying. I also can't find the logical error in your thought process; but I know you are wrong." You are, I believe, quite wrong. That doesn't make you a bad person, I wouldn't restrict where you can live or whom you can marry. You're still wrong; just as wrong as Joe Bob is about the earth and π.

That, of course, means that I am going to need to fight against legislation that ignores the spiritual reality in which we live. Fish live in water, whether they believe it or not. We live in a Creation, whether some believe it or not.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...