Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Physical Change to the Point of Unrecognizability Makes a Food Lose It's Unique Bracha

Spoiler alert: The correct bracha on Pringles® is (and always has been) בורא פרי האדמה/Who creates the fruit of the land; not the more generic שהכל נהיה בדברו/by Whose word everything comes into being.  Yes, I know there are those who argue.  Some out of ignorance/misunderstanding; whose opinions I therefore disregard with extreme prejudice. (Ignorance has no place in halacha.) Others out of a difference in how to weigh the various factors; with whose opinion I respectfully disagree.

We've already discussed how a food can lose it's unique bracha through cooking and/or repurposing it from a food to a beverage. This is another way: by grinding or pulverizing it into an unrecognizable mass. The Shulchan Aruch uses the example of making a paste out of dates (202:7).  The Shulchan Aruch says they do not lose their identity; בורא פרי העץ before eating and על העץ afterward. The Rema agrees that should be the case, but is nervous for those who say the food looses its unique identity by being ground into a paste,  The Rema concludes that the appropriate bracha is שהכל נהיה בדברו before and (therefore) בורא נפשות afterwards; but if one says בורא פרי העץ before eating and על העץ afterward, he has -- after the fact -- fulfilled his obligation.

What is the source of the disagreement? Essentially, point on which the argument turns is whether the vegetable matter paste is recognizable as being said vegetable. That is, cut a chunk out an apple; what's the bracha? Obviously, it's still בורא פרי העץ. Bake that apple and what's the bracha? Obviously, it's still בורא פרי העץ. Take a heaping spoonful; what's the bracha? Obviously, it's still בורא פרי העץ.

That, as they say, is when the trouble begins.  Muhsch (pretty creative spelling, no?) that baked apple into a sauce; what's the bracha? Not so clear and obvious anymore, but it is still בורא פרי העץ. That's because it is homemade apple sauce that has that nice brown color that your baked apple has. If you mix chemicals into the processing to keep it white/yellow -- as they do when making commercial apple sauce -- then the bracha downgrades to שהכל נהיה בדברו. (Note: The chemicals can be as simple as lemon juice and sugar. Also note: I know there is churn in the poskim on this; I am telling you the p'sak of R' Fuerst, shlita.)  The point is not that I know the source of the muhsch, but that I can tell by looking at it. That is, the muhsch looks like the fruit from which it was muhsched. That's why creamy peanut butter is also שהכל נהיה בדברו; that creamy goo just doesn't look like peanuts.

Potatoes are quite interesting. We only eat cooked potatoes (a raw potato would get only a שהכל), and we very often eat them either sliced very thin and deep fried (aka, potato chips) or mashed; both have a characteristic and familiar look. What are Pringles®? Dried potato flakes that have been reconstituted, mixed with a bit of oil/rice flour/spices/chemicals, and then fried into that familiar shape and color we all recognize as potato chips. Since they started as potatoes and the final product looks like potato chips, we don't care about the intermediate stage; the bracha is בורא פרי האדמה.

To summarize (and yes, I know there are other opinions, but this is according the p'sak of R' Fuerst, shilta):
  1. Home made apple sauce is בורא פרי העץ. (Thank you, אור היום.)
  2. Store bought, processed, canned or bottled apple sauce is שהכל נהיה בדברו.
  3. Creamy peanut butter is שהכל נהיה בדברו.
  4. Crunchy peanut butter -- if you eat a bit of peanut first -- is בורא פרי האדמה.
  5. Home made and perhaps some natural coarse ground peanut butter -- probably בורא פרי האדמה.
  6. Pringles® are בורא פרי האדמה.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...