Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: אמונה פשוטה and השגחה פרטית Are the Stars of the Seder

It is embarrassing how recently it is that I actually know where the second cup of wine goes in the seder. Of course when I am reading the haggadah I know where to pick it up and what to say. Until embarrassingly recently, though, I could not have recalled that information any other time.  Sigh...

I can now, and that's when the problem started. A friend asked (in all innocence sort of) when I pick up the second cup. "At לפיכך/declaration of saying how much we owe to HaShem on the heels of
telling the story of leaving Egypt." "Do you hold it until גאל ישראל, or do you put it down during הלל?" I can tell where this is going... but I forge ahead. I actually don't remember that detail, so we grab closest haggadah (Maxwell House, of course) and it says to put the cup down before הלל and then pick it up again for the bracha of גאל ישראל. Of course, I know the next question: "Why? The Shulchan Aruch and Mishna Brura both say to pick it up at לפיכך and hold it all the way through to the end of גאל ישראל. Moreover, we both noted when looking again at the haggadah... הלל actually seems out of place; it looks like it should have come before לפיכך.

Now, you may say, "Pfff! Maxwell House against the Shulchan Aruch and Mishna Brura; what is there to talk about?!" I would agree, except that oodles (thousands? surely. millions? likely) have Jews have used that Maxwell House haggadah for generations. It can't be that they did something completely without basis. Not my idea; that concept is endemic in our halachic literature.

So I looked around at a few more haggados; ones with references. Ha! I found it... the Aruch HaShulchan quotes the Shulchan Aruch and Mishna Brura (and others between) who certainly say that one holds the cup the entire time; not like Maxwell House. Then, though, the Aruch HaShulchan says, "but the custom is to put it down before הלל and then pick it up again for the bracha of גאל ישראל! The Aruch HaShulchan then finds a source: the Rambam's text of the haggadah.  Cool.

Then he said something magical: The words כוס/cup, הטבע/nature, and אל-קים/G-d all have the same numeric value. A Jew knows that there הטבע/nature is a facade and that really אל-קים/G-d is running the show down to the minutest detail; so we lift our כוס/cup at this point to exclaim that proudly. (My free translation and interpretation.) Let's break this down.

When I was diagnosed with cancer (22 years ago), my doctor told me that I had the best kind of cancer. Meaning that there was a cure. So I took the treatments and got cured. Of course, during the treatments I got very, very sick. I knew that would happen and I had/have a long history with my doctor; I have 100% confidence in his abilities the abilities of the team he chose to cure me. My children were not so confident... they saw me getting sicker and sicker, day after day, week after week. It was awful for them. Then I got better. The next year -- on the anniversary of my finishing treatment -- they gave me an award: Most Not Dead. They had experienced the worst fears and now wanted nothing more than to celebrate that it really was good all along!

We tell the story of Egypt: the horrible slavery and torture, followed by the miracles. We break down the miracles at the sea; 50 -- no 200 -- no 250! We examine the kindness and greatness of each and every step - dayeinu! לפיכך is not a response to singing HaShem's praises; לפיכך is a response to seeing how each and every step was orchestrated and managed by HaShem for our benefit -- down to the tiniest detail. How can we not sing הלל after that! And then we conclude with this renewed and deeper אמונה פשוטה/simple (hah!) faith and clarity in HaShem's השגחה פרטית/detailed management of every event with the bracha of גאל ישראל. We exalt that הטבע/nature in the Hand of  אל-קים/G-d is nothing more than this כוס/cup in our own hands.

Praise ye the Lord!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...