Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Difference Between Seeing the Hand of HaShem and the Finger of Hashem

When we read anthropomorphisms of HaShem in the Torah, we often add, "Of course, HaShem doesn't have a hand or a finger or a face... the Torah just uses those terms to help use appreciate some dimension of how HaShem is interacting with the world." What does that mean?

R' Dessler (in his commentary on the Haggadah) notes that the Egyptian magicians saw the plagues as a manifestation of the finger of Elokim/G-d. We, on the other hand, saw the hand of HaShem. They referred to the interaction as mediated by a finger; whose finger? Elokim/G-d.  We referred to the interaction as mediated by the hand; whose hand? HaShem. It's very easy to just skim over those details while racing through "10 miracles in Egypt, so 50 at the sea... which is really 200, or really 250". That's for seder night when we need to keep the children interested and engaged. In truth, though, something quite wonderous has just been revealed to us.

The title Elokim/G-d always refers to physical manifestations of power. That is, the finger of Elokim/G-d is manipulating the physical world they way a scientist manipulates a lab experiment. The scientist can set things in motion, redirect, even introduce new objects; but he is using the laws of nature to carry out the plan he has put into action. So, too, the Egyptian magicians saw this huge supernatural power setting things in motion, redirecting, and even introducing new objects; but always using the laws of nature to carry out the plan He had put into action.

The Jew, on the other hand, see the Hand of HaShem.  Not "a supernatural deity", but the one and only Creator. Not mixing in, but wholly and totally controlling every action and movement. The world is in His Hand, and nothing is outside His control.

Why, then, does the author of the Haggadah go on and on about "it's not 10; it's 50, which is 200 or 250"? For this, R' Dessler brings a Zohar: Count the number of words between the first Elokim and the second, you'll find 13 words. These are the 13 attributes of mercy. Count the number of words between the second Elokim and the third, you'll find 5. That's the five dimensions of salvation that come from HaShem. What comes immediately after the third Elokim? The original light that has been hidden away for the world to come.

Explains R' Dessler: HaShem has built a world on kindness and mercy; even the strict trait of justice in only in service of those 13 attributes of mercy. How can you see that? Look at every salvation and contemplate every miraculous dimension. Don't be satisfied with seeing disconnected events (fingers), but work so see the fabric that brings it all together (the hand). That is the most a person can achieve in this world, and prepares him so be able to appreciate that ultimate light hidden away for the righteous for the world to come.

A non-Jewish colleague once told me he was making a project to read the entire Old Testament. I told him that if he wanted and accurate translation, he should get the Art Scroll chumash. He said, "Oh, I can find lots of free translations on line. Anyway, I am sure the nuances in translation differences wouldn't change my understanding." I told him he was right, the quality of the translation is not going to change his life. Nebbich.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...