Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Why Kaddish is in Aramaic -- Deeply Philosophical and Absolutely Practical

In my youth, I attended exclusively houses of worship (so to speak) associated with the Reform and Conservative Jewish Religions.  Orthodox Judaism frightened me, so it never entered my mind to even enter a shul.  Nonetheless, I knew that we shared one prayer: their prayer for the dead that begins "yisgadal v'yiskadash".  Later I learned that only the old and Orthodox say "yisgadal v'yiskadash", while the modern/enlightened say "yitgadal v'yitkadash".

Since then, of course, I've learned that yis/yit is neither good measure of religiosity nor age.  I have further learned that the entire prayer -- except those first two words -- is in Aramaic.  (Oh, and also except for the last line, which is a direct quote from Iyov and is added to all requests because we always want our requests and actions to increase harmony in the universe.)  Of course, we all understand using Hebrew, the Holy Tongue, for our prayers.  After all, the Torah was given in Hebrew; so heck, if it's good enough for the Creator, it's good enough for us.  But how did Aramaic -- the Aramaic of ancient Babylonia to boot -- have the merit to be used for one of our most precious and exalted prayers?

Tosafos (Brachos 3a, dh יהא שמיה הגדול מבורך) gives two answers.  Tosafos first bring the most amazing idea from the Machzor Vitry: Kaddish is so very beautiful and important praise to HaShem.  It is so beautiful and inspiring that we are fearful that the ministering angels well be jealous.  Therefore, says the Machzor Vitry, Kaddish is expressed in Aramaic specifically because that is the one language that the ministering angels do not understand.  Since they don't understand the prayer, they will not become jealous (and interfere).  Wow.  Cool.  Says Tosafos: Maybe, but you want to know my opinion?  Really, it is just because we know that the world continues in the merit of Jews saying יהא שמיה רבא (Sotah 49a) and Kaddish is recited after Torah lectures that are largely attended by Jews who didn't go to beis yaakov schools and so don't understand Hebrew.  Therefore, to allow those attendants to recite יהא שמיה רבא properly, the Kaddish is formulate in the language of the common people -- Aramaic.

Quite a disagreement, no?  Either because it is so exalted and beautiful we need to sneak it past the ministering angels, or because it is so mundane that even simple, uneducated Jews need to understand it.  Seems unlikely to have such a vast difference in understanding.

The gemara on the previous daf had noted that there are three watches for the ministering angels in heaven, and that we know when they are.  How?  Donkeys bray during the first watch, dogs bark during the second, and during the third... babies want to nurse and wives start talking with their husbands.  Again... huh?  What do any of those things have to do with angels in heaven.  The Maharsha says on that gemara, it means what it says: those mundane activities are associated with those spiritual changing of the guard.  But... there is obviously a deeper meaning.  He explains that these three watches are associated with the three dimensions of the soul: נפש/self-preservation, רוח/life force, נשמה/intellect.  The first watch is that time when people are coming home from a long day and need to eat and drink/refuel their bodies; they are interested in their physical needs.  Donkey in Hebrew is חמור, which is the same root as חומר, physicality.  During the second watch, people are sleeping and are depending on their life force to keep them alive and when they are especially susceptible to the angel of death.  Dogs bark around the angel of death, as we see that the dogs were quiet in the Jewish neighborhoods of Egypt during the last plague of makkos b'choros.  During the last watch of night, one is refreshed and he can direct his mind to Torah (as long as he learns, he merits Torah; just as the suckling baby receives milk) and to prayer (he can ask HaShem for all his needs, just as a wife asks her husband for all her needs.)

The mundane and the spiritual are not contradictory, they are too sides of the same coin.  Every action down here has an affect upstairs, every activity upstairs in reflected in an activity down here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...