Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Applying Halacha in Practice and How Bad is בדיעבד?

Now that my grandchildren are living with us, we sometimes have an out Shabbos to give them a break from us.  We stay and eat with friends who live in an apartment complex; minyan on second floor, lodging and day meals on third floor, erev Shabbos meal and morning kiddush on 15th floor.  I spend a lot of time traversing the stairs from third to 15th floor. (Yes, there is a Shabbos elevator, but you know me -- impatient and a fanatic; so I walk.)  Sometimes our friend's seven year old grandson comes to visit and we go to minyan together.  Once when I needed to run up to the 15th floor to get something, he thought it would be fun to come along.  Along about the 10th floor, he was rethinking just how fun this really was.  As we climbed past the 12th floor, though, I said, "You are going to love this."  We rounded the staircase and he saw -- much to his delight -- that we had completely skipped the 13th floor and were magically on the 14th floor.  Rest the of the trip and back down was a breeze.

I recognized the look of joy and relief on his face, because it was the same feeling I had the first time I learned Mishna Brura and finally got through siman 36.  I say "finally", because siman 32 has 52 siyefim; it's like arriving at the other end of a journey through the Sahara desert when you finally get through.  Then there is siman 34 with details upon details about Rabeinu Tam t'fillin.  Anyway; after siman 36 comes eight whole pages of something called "Mishnas Sofrim" on the details of how to make each and every letter as well as minutia on actually writing the scrolls for t'fillin.  I gleefully turned past all that (the first time) and moved on to siman 37 feeling very accomplished (for those few moments), indeed.

That was many years ago and I have since learned the Mishna Brura again.  This time I have bitten the bullet and am learning every Biur Halacha... even in Mishnas Sofrim.  Even, since I had made this personal commitment, concerning Rabbeinu Tam t'fillin.  I almost recanted, when I saw a two page Biur Halacha on the issues with wearing Rabbeinu Tam t'fillin at the same time as your Rashi t'fillin.  Since I only wear Rashi t'fillin (like most people) and if I ever thought to wear Rabbeinu Tam t'fillin, it would only be after removing my Rashi t'fillin (again; like most people).  So that Biur Halacha was long and complex and very far removed from anything I am likely to do; still, a deal is a deal (even if it is only with yourself), so I was stuck.

As it happens, the R' Kagan filed away a couple of extraordinarily fundamental ideas in those Biur Halacha's!  The first Biur Halacha in Mishnas Sofrim notes the he does not always tell you when this or that detail is לכתחילה or בדיעבד.  He does that for one of three reasons:
  1. It's obvious.
  2. It depends on other factors.
  3. He himself is not sure, so he just brings it up and notes the sources so you can make your own investigation if it becomes relevant to a practical application.
Those principles, it seems to be, are really an underlying foundation of any halachic work; they just don't speak it out so clearly.  That is why you can't just open a book (especially an English sefer that is mostly a summary), look up your question and be done with it.  Unless you study that topic, you have no idea what is obvious and what is not.  Unless you have all the relevant factors at hand, you have no idea how that will change things.  If you don't have more clarity on the subject than the author, you are really in trouble.

So... you'll tell me, "I'll just be stringent; then I'll always be fine."  Nope, as stringencies in one area often lead to leniencies in another (a sort of halachic "Whac-A-Mole").  So... you'll say, "For goodness, sake, it's only לכתחילה or בדיעבד; what's the big deal?"  For that you need that two page Biur Halacha on wearing Rabbeinu Tam t'fillin.  In the midst of which, R' Kagan brings a Yerushalmi that says brings up the case of someone who brought a korban chatas, which requires two sprinklings which are four (ie, on two opposite corners of the altar).  The kohein, however, is lazy and only makes on sprinkling.  The gemara says that בדיעבד it still works (that is, brings atonement), but the kohein has also transgressed the Torah prohibition of בל תגרע!  The Biur Halacha says that this is an obvious challenge to anyone who is lazy about any mitzvah and decides to get away with בדיעבד.  Besides the issue of missing out on לכתחילה, his laziness has also brought him to transgress a Torah prohibition.  Going for בדיעבד instead of לכתחילה, then, is no better than eating a ham sandwich.

The only hope, of course is: (1) learn halacha better; and (2) you really, really, really need a rav.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...