Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: What's the Deai with תענית בכורות?

When I first started becoming more observant, I started fasting תענית בכורות/Fast of the Firstborn on erev Pesach.  After I became fully observant, I learned that I had been wrong to fast on two counts:

  1. I am no longer a בכור so I didn't have to fast.
  2. The custom is for בכורים to attend a siyum in order to participate in a s'udas mitzvah and not to fast.
Live and learn.

The truth is that תענית בכורות is a strange fast anyway.  It's the only fast where the minhag is to not fast.  That is, attendance of a siyum is not seen as a "if you happen to attend a siyum you don't have to fast", instead it is the observance of choice.  Groups plan ahead to have a siyum scheduled with the express purpose of getting the בכורים off the hook.  I have seen two explanations of this phenomenon.

R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach, ztz"l, explains that that the בכורים are fasting because originally it was the בכור in each family who was responsible for the avodah.  They only lost that job to the Kohanim after the disaster of the חטא העגל.  According to that, the fast has nothing to Pesach, so why is it observed on erev Pesach?  On that day every family -- potentially millions of groups -- is bringing their lamb (or goat, I suppose) as far as they can, then turning the animal over to the Kohanim.  The בכורים therefore feel their loss -- that loss of an opportunity to come closer to HaShem -- with a particular poignancy on that day.  Their first response is to want to fast as repentance, which is certainly appropriate.  However, they can do more: Their loss is an opportunity to come close to HaShem -- learning Torah also brings one closer to HaShem.  Their attendance to a syum emphasizes that we can still come as close to HaShem as we want; the effort it up to us, but the channel is open.  Their participation in a siyum, therefore, achieves the same goal as fasting.

The Chasam Sofer (thank you, again, Dirshu) says that the custom goes back to that very first Pesach in Mitrayim -- the Jewish בכורים were nervous about whether they had enough merit to make it through the night, so they fasted to do t'shuva before the fact.  (Not much different than the תענית אסתר, actually.)  This also explains why the father of a בכור fasts as well; he wants to save his son!  The Chasam Sofer doesn't explain the custom to avoid fasting, but it seems to me that the same reasoning of R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach, ztz"l applies here just as well.

Interestingly, according to the reason of the Chasam Sofer, a non-Jewish בכור might also have a reason to fast.  It stands to reason that those non-Jewish בכורים who wanted to attach themselves by conversion to Klal Yisrael would have also fasted.  There are, in fact, poskim who recommend that a ger who was a בכור should try to attend a siyum.  You know me -- give me an inch and I'll take a mile -- I plan to make my own siyum on Bava Kamma, just to cover all my bases.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...