Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Why the Purim Miracle Convinced Us To Accept Oral Law Willingly

As we all know, there is a famous medrash that Klal Yisrael was initially forced to accept the Torah: Har Sinai was held over the heads of the entire nation, "Accept the Torah, then all is good; refuse, this is your grave."  (Obviously, of course, they said, "Yes, Sir!")  When did they accept the Torah willingly and with love?  At Purim, as we read in M'gillas Esther, "Kimlu v'kiblu ha'y'hudim"/the Jews fulfilled and accepted [the Torah] (Esther 9:27)  (The medrash is going on the logical absurdity of fulfilling before accepting.)

Then there is the other famous medrash that when Moshe Rabeinu proffered to Klal Yisrael (before the above incident, obviously) the opportunity to accept the Torah, that they answered "Everything that HaShem says, we will do and we will hear!" (Sh'mos 24:7), to which HaShem responded, "Who told My children the secret known only to the angels?"  That secret being that Klal Yisrael accepted with enthusiasm to immediately start doing without question, and then spend their lives researching the reasoning and deeper meanings of every mitzvah.  (The medrash is going on the logical absurdity of doing before hearing.)

There is a lot of beautiful Torah written on resolving this paradox.  The most famous answer (that is, the one I know) is from the Maharal,  Again, he has a lot of details, but at the end of the day and when the dust has settled, the basic idea is: At Har Sinai, the Jews accepted the Written Torah enthusiastically and with love, but had to be coerced into accepting the Oral Torah.  Then at Purim time, they accepted the Oral Torah also, this time enthusiastically and with love.

Here's a question that should have been obvious but never occurred to me: What changed at Purim to win Klal Yisrael over the Oral Law that was not accomplished by all the amazing miracles of y'tzi'as mitzrayim?  That's the question posed by Emes l'Yaakov at the end of parshas Ki Savo.  I read that question and almost fell off my chair.  "Heck yeah", I thought, "What the hey!?"  Those miracles at yitzi'as mitzrayim were awesome, stupendous, out of this world!

Exactly, answers Emes l'Yaakov... they all showed that HaShem had complete control of this world; at any moment reality could change on a dime.  That's the Written Torah; entirely from outside the world, beyond the grasp of human resoning.  Of course they accepted that.. HaShem is the Author of creation, it would be ludicrous but to anything but accept His Torah without question.  But the Oral Torah seems to be a collaborative.  The sages of all generation delve, dissect, debate, and discover.  Klal Yisrael was very nervous about accepting such a body of legislature.  With all the good intentions in the world, who says mistakes would't creep in?

Then came Purim.  No one event was in any way unnatural.  Even the cause and effect of each event and it's outcome,  totally predictable.  Nothing out of the ordinary.  Until you look at the whole picture... then you see the Hand of HaShem carefully and precisely conducting each and every event, each and every encounter, each and every moment.  What looks like normal man made political intrigue is actually the playing out of HaShem's Will.  No chance for error.  When Klal Yisrael saw that, they realized that all the debate and process of the Oral Law is certainly man made, but the conclusions and dictates are pure Ratzon HaShem -- revelation of HaShem's Will.

The miracle and intent of Purim was not that Haman be deposed and Mordechai become viceroy.  The miracle and intent of Purim was to demonstrate to Klal Yisrael that their efforts to sincerely plumb the depths of Torah to discover the Mind of their Creator are guaranteed to succeed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...