Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Paying a Worker Who Steals from You

Paying for weddings is an interesting business, but here's a new issue... the father (who was paying for the meal) decided he wanted to make his guests even more comfortable with the already well supervised kashrus by hiring an independent mashgiach.  So far, so good.  At the end of the evening, the caterer (who owned the hall) told him that several cases of chicken had been stolen.  This caterer, however, had cameras set up to video the chasuna -- including the kitchen area.  He invited the father to watch the videos with him to help him identify the thief.  By this time you may have already guessed the thief's identity: the mashgiach!  They called in the mashgiach, who very embarrassedly admitted his crime; "I am not making enough to support my family and I knew you (the father) could well afford a couple of cases of chickens and thought you wouldn't even miss them!"  He (the mashgiach) was correct on the first count and wrong on the second count.  The chickens were returned; no harm, no foul (since they found the fowl).  Case closed.

Except the mashgiach now wanted to be paid for his hasgacha.  The father blew a gasket, "I wanted an honest, G-d fearing supervisor!  Get out!"  After he calmed down, however, he decided that he better ask just to make sure.  The question went to R' Eliashiv, ztz"l.  Both his analysis and the resulting p'sak are enlightening.

First of all, said R' Eliashiv, every Jew has a "chezkas kashrus"/presumption of honesty.  Therefore, the father certainly has to pay for the time till the stealing occurred.  That is, even though he stole at (let's say) 10:00PM, that didn't retroactively change his status.  You don't have to hire him again, but till 10:00PM he was certainly fit for the job and needs to be paid.  What about after the robbery occurred?

Before we answer that, consider the following p'sak of the Shulchan Aruch (Choshen Mishpat 359:4): Even someone who is stealing to to save his life (ie, he is so poor that he can't afford even basic necessities), may only steal on condition that he plans to repay.  R' Moshe explains simply, the injunction "v'chai bahem"/you shall live by them (the laws of the Torah) means that one can and should transgress any law -- except the big three; murder, adultery, and public idolatry (such as christianity).  Of course, though, one needs to steal with intent to repay.

What if he can't repay?  He is so poor and knows is situation is unlikely to change; what then?  He is still permitted.  More than that, the target of the robbery has to help him!  After all, he himself has the mitzvah of tzedaka.

This mashgiach was not that poor, so none of that applies.  However, the final p'sak was that the mashgiach was due his full payment.  After all, the kitchen staff didn't know he was going to steal chickens, so they were extra careful around him and so he successfully carried out his mission.

None the less, I find it amazing and inspiring how far our Torah goes to find a z'chus/merit for every Jew.  Good thing to know as we approach the Yom HaDin.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...