Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Food Prepared by Goyim from Kosher Ingredients

Right up there with the expression "Judeo-Christian" ethic, is that old canard that the kosher dietary laws are the trumped up remnants of ancient (read: ignorant, but well meaning) health standards.  Their proof is, "Well, pork can be bad for you if you don't cook it well and pork is not kosher -- WALA and QED!"  When confronted with the fact that certain perfectly edible fats of kosher animals, milk of non-kosher animals, and non-Jewish wine used in their idolatrous practices (yayin nesech) are also not kosher, they have a ready answer: "Wow... those ancients were so illogical; that doesn't fit the pattern at all!"  Sigh...

In any case, yayin nesech is, indeed, a category of non kosher food.  Chazal broadened that to "stam yanam"/their ordinary wine.  Chazal added three other categories of non-Jewish foods: oils, baked goods, and cooked foods.  In all those cases, the non-Jewish food is forbidden even if there is no admixture of non-kosher ingredients.  Two fundamental and complimentary reasons are given for these injunctions.  First, there is the obvious problem that someone who is not personally concerned (or even believes there is a problem) with non-kosher ingredients is not going to be as careful about small "mistakes".  Just as you wouldn't eat in a restaurant that didn't allow the health inspectors in the door and also don't even really believe in bacteria -- despite their claims that everything is healthy; you really don't want to eat food prepared by someone with that feeling about kosher food.

A second, and just as fundamental, reason was to prevent intermarriage.  If you can share food, you'll come to eat and drink together, then your children will be around their children -- their nice, your nice... wedding bells, rachmana latzlan.  The second reason is why watching everything they cook and even providing the ingredients doesn't help.  In fact, that can make things worse as far as coming to inappropriate relationships. (My!  Look how respectful they are!)

You may have never heard there is an issue with shemen akum (oil produced by non-Jews).  That's because oil is usually no rendered at home and it is needed for dailying living.  Every decree by Chazal needs ratification by the entire Jewish nation, and that one was never ratified, so it never became a legally binding decree.  Bread is also necessary for daily living, but it's relatively common for people to make their own bread.  (I mean, of course, besides lazy Americanos.)  But bakeries are also common.  As a consequence, bakery bread is really permitted, though there are those who are stringent (and that is certainly meritorious, all things being equal, to do so).  Moreover, most everyone is stringent during the Aseres Y'mei T'shuva, from Rosh HaShanah through Yom Kippur; after all, if there ever was a time to be looking for merits, that's it.

That leaves us with bishul akum and stam yeinam.  We should talk more about those; there are lots of cool details.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...