Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Safeik d'Rabanan l'Kula, Except B'dika

We all go more than a little nuts before Pesach (more than usual, I mean).  It's not entirely our own fault, Chazal added some fuel to this fire.  The Torah requires that we not have chameitz during Pesach; in fact, it demands that we destroy any chameitz that we have (that's why we like to specifically leave over chameitz and burn it before the Torah takes it away from us; but that's another story).  Chazal have required us to fulfill this requirement by doing two things before Pesach: bikur/bi'ur (search/check  and destroy any chameitz in our environs) and bitul (nullification of any chameitz in our environs).  Mi'di'oraisa, either would be enough, but Chazal required both.

Bikur/bi'ur is required because Chazal were nervous that you might not be wholeheartedly sincere in your declaration that all that beer and cake in the fridge/pantry is ownerless (uh-huh... sure you meant it).  Bitul is required in case you missed something in your search and destroy mission; since you thought you destroyed it, your bitul was sincere.  Classic belts and suspenders.

Of course, required is required; m'di'oraisa or mi'd'raban.  In this case, though, one or the other -- bi'ur or bitul -- is required mi'di'oraisa; once that decision is made, the other get knocked down to d'rabanan.  Still, required is required; m'di'oraisa or mi'd'raban -- except when it comes to cases of uncertainty.  If one is left in a case of uncertainty, if it is before the 6th hour on erev Pesach, then one can m'vatel whatever might be the source of uncertainty and... voila -- safeik d'rabanan l'kula, problem solved; but if it is after the 6th hour, by which time the Torah has rendered the chameitz forbidden completely, and so the erstwhile owner can no longer m'vatel it (there is no value to nullify) and... voila -- safeik di'oraisa l'chumra, biur required!

One case in which we do not say "safeik d'rabanan l'kula" is when the safeik would require a new b'dika.  For example, a rat grabs a roll and zips into that house you just checked.  You run after him, but only find some crumbs.  Since rats (unlike children) are not messy eaters, one must assume that those crumbs came from "the world" (probably junior, the messy eater) and so one must do a new b'dika.  Another case would be where one had gathered 10 donuts for the morning last hurrah, but in the morning there are only nine donuts!  Aaargh... one must go looking for that errant donut.  Why?  Just m'vatel it, knocking the issue down to a d'rabanan and be done with it.

Since the requirement for a b'dika is actually built on the situation of uncertainty, this is not a case of safeik d'rabanan; this is instead precisely the case in which Chazal required the b'dika in the first place.  Happy hunting!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...
Post a Comment
Read more