Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Repaying a Loan Is a Mitzvah

Often my difficulties in gemara are due to me being thick and/or obstinate and/or lazy.  Meaning to say that I don't see things the way the gemara does and I really want the gemara just to look at the world as I do and it's just too much work right now to do the research that will convince me to change.  That, of course, can be very frustrating.  HaShem, however, "throws me a bone" once in a while and lets me have a really, really good question.  The responses I get ("oooo!  Good question!" or "I know!  I spent a week on that myself.") feed my ego enough to keep me going for a long time.  Big egos need very little encouragement, as they are largely self-sustaining, so I only get these great questions once in a while.

The gemara (Gitten 36b), in its discussion of prozbul, takes a small detour to understand why we need prozbul now a days according to Rebbi, who holds that we do not have shmittas k'safim (forgiving of loans in the shmitta year) while we are in exile.  The gemara answers that Chazal established shmittas k'safim now a days as a remembrance to the d'oraiso obligation.  Hang on one cotton pickin' minute, rejoins the gemara, how can Chazal cancel a loan that the Torah leaves in force!?!  (My free translation; not ArtScroll.)  Rashi explains the question: since the money is actually -- m'di'oraiso -- owed to the lender, Chazal are turning the borrower into a thief.  Abaye resolves the issue, "shev v'lo sa'aseh" -- they are just telling the borrower to refrain from fulfilling the mitzvah of repaying his debt.  We are all used to that answer; that's the same reason we don't blow shofar when (the first day of) Rosh HaShanah falls on Shabbos.  The Torah says "blow", Chazal say "don't blow"; shev v'lo sa'aseh -- Chazal win.

Hang on one cotton pickin' minute!  (That's me this time, not my free translation of the gemara.)  Chazal can tell Bob not to fulfill the mitzvah to repay Leon the lender, but Bob still has Leon's money!  Isn't Bob still a thief?  He has Chazal's blessing, but the thief problem does not seem to have been solved nor even addressed.

It turns out that there is no trivial, "oh... my bad" kind of answer to this question (hence my big ego boost).  The easiest way through this is azoi (ie, as follows).  The gemara originally thought that there are two reasons that Bob needs to return the money.  First, Bob has Leon's money; that's stealing.  Second, Bob has a mitzvah of paying off the debt.  The gemara answered: That's not how a loan works.  When Leon gives the money to Bob, the money now belongs to Bob free and clear.  However, Bob has simultaneously accepted upon himself the obligation to repay the loan.  That obligation is a real live mitzvah; probably d'oraiso.  Moreover, if Bob does not fulfill that mitzvah at the time the loan is due, then he is considered a thief.  Technically it is "oshek" and not "gezel", but it amounts to the same thing.  Once Chazal tell Bob to refrain from paying, though, both the obligation and the thievery fall away.

This is all needed to even begin to understand about 6 words in Rashi; and we've really only scratched the surface.  See why I don't even try daf yomi?  I can't even do Rashi Yomi.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...