Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Mercy Does Not Contradict Strict Judgement

It is not uncommon (I've done it myself, actually) to begin a drash this time of year with the question of why should we be judged before we ask for atonement.  Wouldn't it make more sense, begins the darshan, to gain atonement first and then go to court with a plea bargain in hand?  Various answers are offered; and many beautiful d'rashes have been formulated.  I would like to contend, however, that the question is built on a misunderstanding of what is happening this time of year.  I came to this realization after a lovely day spent with my wife.  (No, smarty, it was not one of those times I needed to ask for forgiveness from her.)

We started our day together learning from M'silas Yesharim after breakfast.  The M'silas Yesharim notes that the attribute of mercy does not contradict the attribute of strict justice.  I sort of got what he was saying, but not the depth of it; it still seems like mercy lets you get way with stuff that justice would say, "Not so fast there, buddy!"

We went out to lunch and came out to find a ticket on the windshield!  Aargh, we had been so careful about the parking meter!  I pulled of the ticket and found that we were being fined ($60, by the way) for not having a front license plate.  Huh?  So I looked; sure enough, no front license plate.  (Quick; without looking... is there a front license plate on your bumper?)  Over the next week we ordered a new plate and had it securely fastened to the front bumper.  I sent in the ticket with the receipt showing the license had been ordered and attached and hoped they would let me off this time with just a warning.  Instead I got the judgement back a week or so later telling me that the no fine was owed.  Why?  Because the facts of the accusation were wrong; we did, in fact, have a front license plate.  They didn't want to punish us for not having a front license plate; they just wanted us to have a front license plate.  The threat of a fine got us moving in a way that just having the regulation on the books did not.

What we experience as threats of punishment from HaShem is really just a matter of getting our attention.  Getting us to look at what we are doing and where we have deficiencies.  As Rosh HaShana approaches, we begin to look at ourselves more critically.  We see things missing that we hadn't noticed.  Maybe we should call Rosh HaShana, the Day of Assessment or Day of Evaluation.  On Yom Kippur we get to report on what we are doing to address the deficiencies.  If we did have the threat of punishment, who know when we would address our deficiencies.  These deficiencies are not just a missing license plate, there are problems with critical organs needed for our true, eternal existence.  It would be nothing short of cruel to leave us with those deficiencies!

Mercy gives us the time to evaluate and correct.  HaShem loves us and wants us to perfect itself.  Not only does mercy not contradict justice, it actually enables true justice.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...