Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Being Yotzi With T'kiyas Shofar

Just for the record.  It's "korei" or "ba'al kriya"; it's "tokei'a" or "ba'al t'kiya".  When a ba'al k'riya is asked, "Are you a ba'al korei?", an accurate answer would be, "No".  A more informative answer would be, "No, I am Orthodox.  My wife, however, is a ba'alas korei."  The appropriate answer is, of course, "Yes."

There are some fascinating issues with being yotzi t'kiyas shofar when someone else is blowing.  More than fascinating, we are talking a very chashuv and chaviv mitzvas asei m'd'oraiso, so it's worth getting things right.  The first rule that everyone knows is that for this to work at all, the ba'al t'kiya needs to:
  1. be obligated in the mitzvah himself
  2. have kavana to be blowing a "mitzvah blast", and not just tooting a tune
  3. have intent to be motzi the intended hearer; aka "shomei'a" or "ba'al shmiya" (What?  I've made my point, you say?  No need to drive it into the ground?  Sheesh; spoil sport!)
Before proceeding, I'd like to review exactly how this yotzi/motzi thing works for kiddush.  (I could use "ha'motzi", but that would just be a capricious misuse of potential punniness.)  As already discussed, it is based on the principle of shomei'a k'ona and appropriate kavanos on both sides.  The one saying kiddush has to have in mind that he will speak for you, if you want that.  He can even have in mind to be motzi some and not others.

T'kiyas shofar, however, is not based on shomei'a k'ona.  The mitzvah of t'kiyas shofar is to hear the blast, not say it. The ba'al t'kiya cannot hear for me!  Yet he must have in mind to motzi me.  Moreover, the way the Rahn explains arus (which is also an ingredient in this whole thing working), is that if one Jew has not fulfilled his mitzvah, than all Jews are lacking in their mitzvah fulfillment.  It seems strange, therefore, that a ba'al t'kiya needs to have the hearer in mind at all.  After all, he is blowing a proper blast and he is obligated in the mitzvah as long as any Jewish man hasn't heard the shofar; that should be enough to make the process work.  The fact that the ba'al t'kiya does need to have in mind to motzi the hearer leads to Halichos Shlomo to say one must say a huge chidush -- that the ba'al  t'kiya is in charge of that sound all the way to the listener's ear.  The ba'al t'kiya can decide that the blast is a mitvah blast for one listener and just a toot on the horn for another!

This brings up an interesting question: suppose the ba'al t'kiya makes a mistake and decides to redo a the end t'kiya, but you think it was just fine and have kavana for the start t'kiya of the next set.  Since his kavana does not match yours, perhaps you are not yotzi.  Cool, huh?

Two things come out from this.  First, it is best to have kavana to hear whatever the ba'al t'kiya has in mind to blow.  Second, stay on his good side; and his wife's for that matter.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...