Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Reading the Signs of Where You Are Headed

One of favorite parts of Megilas Esther is when Mordechai is discussing with Esther whether or not to go to the king.  Esther is hesitant, and Mordechai responds (4:14), "Who knows?  Maybe it is for a time as this that you were elevated to royalty!" Maybe?!?  Who knows?!?  Isn't that the point of this whole story?  Yes, they are in the middle of things, but Mordechai had been watching this story unfold for 10 years.  Moreover, Mordechai was on the Anshei K'nesset HaG'dolah (The Men of the Great Assembly), which was made of or prophets and near prophets.  If anyone was in a position to know what was going on, it was Mordechai.  And he didn't.

Lesson learned: Never say, "Oh, I know why that happened."  No; you don't.

But sometimes you do get an indication from Heaven that you should change your ways.  Chazal tell us that the parasha describing the punishment of the sota is next to the parasha describing nazirus to tell you that anyone who sees a sota in her degradation should take a vow of nazirus.  R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach explains this as a sign from Heaven bases on another Chazal: b'derech sh'adam rotze leilech ba, molichim oso -- a person's actions, thoughts, and even desires creates a spiritual channel that makes progress in that direction easier (Makkos 10a, as explained by the Maharshah).  So seeing the sota is an indication to the person that such is the spiritual path he has created; time to repent and change his ways!

R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach uses this principle to explain another halacha.  If a person were to see, Rachmana Latzlan, a sefer Torah being burned, he should fast.  In fact, even if he see a sefer torah fall, he should fast; though he can also give tzedaka in that case. On the other hand, if a person sees a Talmid Chacham -- a living sefer torah -- leave this world, he should tear kriyah, but there is no obligation to fast.  Why the difference?  Each Jew has his unique cheilek in the Torah.  When one see a sefer torah burning, or even falling, it means that hashgacha has shown him that his particular cheilek is being destroyed.  That is, the spiritual path that he has set for himself is leading in that direction.  He has no personal cheilek, on the other hand, in the Talmid Chacham.

Perhaps you are feeling very smug now that you haven't seen a sota nor have you seen a sefer torah burning and therefore you feel secure in your chosen path.  Perhaps that's true; perhaps you are so securely on your chosen path that Heaven figures you aren't going to pay attention to such subtle signs.  You might want to take stock and re-evaluate your path before Heaven comes up with something a touch less subtle.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...