Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Torah/Orthodox Judaism -- What It Is/What It Isn't

I had the opportunity for spend Shabbos with a mixed group.  Included in that group was a person whose maternal (and probably paternal as well, but that's irrelevant) lineage is Jewish back to Mt Sinai, but who is very active as a congregant in a Reform Jewish Temple; let's call him Oscar.  There was another whose maternal lineage has been most decidedly non-Jewish since sheishes y'mei b'reishis, but who is active in a Conservative Jewish Synagogue; let's call her Christy.  I was there also, let's call me Michael.

There were a lot of people there, so by late Shabbos afternoon, the hot water urn had been depleted.  Christy said that was too bad, as she would like a hot coffee.  Michael piped up, "Go ahead and add water to the urn."  Oscar said, "Oh?  We can do that?"  Michael immediately warned, "No, Oscar, you certainly cannot do that."  Christy asked, "Why can I add hot water and Oscar can't?  He is not more observant than I am!"  Michael answered, in all innocence, "Because, Christy, Oscar is Jewish and you aren't."  I expected Christy to just say, "Oh, right; I wasn't thinking."  She didn't.

Christy's problem, of course, is that she mixes up observance of halacha with being a member of klal yisrael.  Someone born in the United States to citizens of the United States is a citizen of the United States.  Whether or not he chooses to follow all or none of the laws of the land, he is a citizen.  On the other hand, someone born in France to parents who are citizens of France will not be a citizen of the United States. Even if he chooses to obey all laws and ordinances of the land.  The only way that Frenchman can become a citizen of the United States is to naturalize according to the laws of the United States; and once they are citizens, that's it, they're citizens.  Analogously, a person born to a Jewish woman, or someone who converts under the auspices of an Orthodox Jewish court is Jewish; that's it.  Christy isn't Jewish even though she is on the ritual committee at her synagogue.  Oscar is Jewish even if he becomes a minister (rachmana latzlan).

Non- (actually Anti-) Torah religions that call themselves "jewish", such as Reform Judaism and Jews for Jesus, are a real danger to the Jews that they all too frequently entice into their movements.  (Even one Jew lost to them is too many; way too many.)  A Jew who eats non-kosher food or violates Shabbos is damaging his soul.  These movements not only encourage such violations, but teach that "that's what G-d really wants".  Baruch HaShem these movements are becoming less of a threat.  J for J is recognized as just a front.  Reform, because of it's intermarriage rate, is already mostly goyim anyway.  None the less, it is our job -- the members of klal yisrael who do observe halacha, to recognize those religions for what they are and offer no compromise.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction.  That is, even th

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק