Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Mishpatim Are Logical... Why?

Mitzvos can be categorized as mishpatim and chukim.  Mishpatim are the ones you would know even if the Torah had not stated them, chukim the ones that are simply decrees from the King with no humanly understandable logic.  I never thought into that much, seems pretty clear.  Then I started thinking (always a good idea) and I realized that I don't understand that statement at all.  There wasn't an empty reality sitting around and then HaShem one day said, "Hey, I know what would be fun!  I am going to make some people and stuff, give them rules, then punish and reward them depending on how they follow they rules.  Of course, I'll have to work around the logical rules that already exit."  (I would like to say that nothing could be further from the Truth; after all, I do have a pretty good imagination and I can't imagine anything more false.  Alas, the apikosim have had way too much practice and experience for me to limit their possibilities.  None the less, it's in that category.)

The problem is that there was nothing that HaShem "had to deal with"; ein od milvado!  There wasn't even nothing, actually.  HaShem had to create a place of nothing (tzimtzum, for your kabbala aficionados)  into which to create the something of tohu va'vohu and then say "Let there be light!"; the rest, as they say, is history.  That means that the only reason that mishpatim are logical is because HaShem made them logical.  In other words, mishpatim are simply decrees from the King with no humanly understandable logic... sound familiar?  So what, in fact, is the difference between chukim and mishpatim?

I heard R' Avigdor Miller, ztz"l, discussing the oft repeated phrase in the gemara: lama li kra, s'vara hi -- why do I need a verse, it can be deduced by a logical inference.  R' Miller said, in amazement, "What do you mean?  I would have expected to ask why do I care about logic, it's a verse!  You see from here that human logical inference is d'oraisa!"  That is, the ability to reason and the rules of logic that are built into a person are meant to be used to tell us d'oraisa obligations, just as much as what is expressed in the Torah (both Written and Oral) itself.

Awesome.  So ultimately, everything is g'zeiros haMelech - decrees of the King.  What, then is the difference between mishpatim and chukim?  Mishpatim were revealed to us by design at b'ri'as ha'olam -- creation of the world.  Chukim were revealed to us by prophecy at ma'amad har sinai - revelation at Mt Sinai.  As long as we this far out on that limb, I'll just go one step further and note (as explained by the Ramchal in Sefer haIkarim) that the only difference between d'oraisa and d'rabanan is that d'oraiso was revealed (at b'ri'as ha'olam and) ma'amd har sinai, whereas d'rabanan is a revalation through the process of logical reasoning (as designed into a person from b'ri'as ha'olam) applied to Torah (revealed at Har Sinai) as conducted by our Sages.

Ultimately all from one source (the One), all one beautiful system purpose built to allow us to know our Creator.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction.  That is, even th

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק