Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Yagati u'Matzati -- I BELIEVE!

Dramatic teaser:
Second paragraph of note 31 in Dirshu edition of Mishna Brura to si'ef koton 20 in the Mishna Brura commenting on siman 206, si'ef 5 in the Orach Chaim section of the Shulchan Aruch.

I had the z'chus to hear many divrei torah from R' Henoch Leibowitz, ztz"l.  The rosh yeshiva was once explaining the chazal, "yagati u'matzati" -- if someone says that he worked hard and found the solution, believe him.  "Which is it?  Yigi'a (exertion) or m'tzi'a (a find)?  Either you work hard and develop a solution, or you find a solution; not both!  What does it mean?  Solutions and understanding in torah cannot be developed, they are all a find; like a beautiful gem.  However, HaShem only gives you the gem if he sees you will appreciate it; which you do by working hard.  If you work hard (enough), HaShem will surely reward you."

I have had a question for months.  Suppose you have an apple and a banana in front of you, you plan to eat both, and you like them equally well.  L'chatchila, you should make a bracha on the apple first, then the banana.  So you pick up the apple in your right hand and with intent to eat the apple, accidentally make the bracha "borei p'ri ha'adama".  Now what?  On the one hand, borei pri adama works (b'di'avad) for an apple, so you can eat that, but what about the banana?  Do we say that since you were going to eat the banana anyway and you accidentally made the appropriate bracha, that you can now eat it?  Or do we say that since you had intent to eat the apple, the bracha has no relevance to the banana, and so you need to make another borei pri ha'adama on the banana?  On the other hand, there are poskim who hold that borei pri ha'adama doesn't work for apples -- even l'chatchila -- so maybe you should eat the banana first and then make a borei pri ha'eitz on the apple.

This question hasn't kept me up nights, but it has occupied many hours of my waking and biking time over the last several months.  Every time I learned a new si'ef on brachos I would think about how it could apply to my question.  (That's what generated those possibilities.)  Then, this morning, out of the blue, right there in the econd paragraph of note 31 in Dirshu edition of Mishna Brura to si'ef koton 20 in the Mishna Brura commenting on siman 206, si'ef 5 in the Orach Chaim section of the Shulchan Aruch.  My question.  R' Shteinman, shilta, says b'stama you can't eat the banana without making another bracha.  I'll add that just to cover all bases, you can firmly decide not to eat the banana just yet; then when you change your mind and decide to eat it, everyone agrees you need to make a new borei pri ha'adama.

I am walking around glowing today.  That was one little question.  I have many, many more and much, much bigger questions regarding very serious issues in my life.  If I am this happy with one little gem, I can't even imagine what the next world is going to feel like when I get answers to those!  Whoa!  Talk about "az y'malei s'chok pinu" -- then our mouths will be filled with laughter!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction.  That is, even th

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק