Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Ma'aseh Merkava, Ma'aseh B'reishis, Arayos

More from the first introduction to G'vuros HaShem; after all, it's good to know about reality.

The gemara (Chagiga 11a) says that one may expound on ma'aseh merkava only to himself, ma'aseh b'reishis to a single talmid (at a time) only, and arayos to two (at a time) talmidim.  Why these three topics have restrictions in how they are taught and why these particular restrictions is the topic d'jour.

There are three dimensions to creating a new system: the thought to create the system, the creation of the parts, and the creation of the rules by which the parts interact.  The Maharal does not use these terms, but they are also called different "olamos" (worlds) and there are four: olam ha'atzilus, olam ha'bri'a, olam ha'y'tzira, and olam ha'asi'a.  The Maharal has lumped bri'a (yeish mei'ayin -- something from nothing) and y'tzira (yeish mi'yeish -- something from something) into one concept of creation.  That is also not uncommon, as you see in the kaddish: l'olam [atzilus] u'l'olamei [plural, b'ri'a and y'tzira] almai'ya [asi'a].  (There's some very, very cool stuff being expressed in davening.)

The Maharal uses the pasuk "b'rov am hadras melech" (the magnitude of the glory of the king goes like the size of his nation) [Mishlei 14:28] in a fascinating way.  Usually the d'rash from that pasuk is understood to mean that it is better to do a mitzvah together rather than everyone separately.  For example, it is better for one person to make kiddush on Shabbos and Yom Tov than for everyone to make their own kidduch.  Why?  B'rov am hadras melech -- more people are united in the mitzvah of kiddush.  The Maharal, however, focusses on the word "am" (nation).  It is only a glory for the king when it is a nation functioning together.  HaShem is only "king" once creation is finished, because only then can there be a nation.  Therefore taking about the epoch "before" creation is in full swing is just not the same as learning about the fully functioning world.  Hence the restrictions.

Why these particular restriction?  The Maharal notes that a lesson is best learned when the learning environment is as much like the topic being learned as possible.  At the ma'aseh merkava stage, there is only HaKadosh Baruch Hu.  Just as the rider on a chariot is separate completely from his vehicle, HaShem is alone and separate from His world; therefore ma'aseh merkava can only be expounded to one's self.  Ma'aseh b'reishis, on the other hand is all about a direct connection between the Creator  and His creation, hence the rav expounds to a single talmid.  Finally, arayos -- which the Maharal says really means the secrets/foundation of what it means that some relationships are permitted and some forbidden is about how the creation interacts with itself to bring the creation to its desired purpose.  You need two to tango, so arayos is taught rav to two talmidim.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...