Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Arisus, S'chirus, Kablanus (Oh my!)

I have tried once again to understand how it works to permissibly partner with a goy to make money with your stuff on Shabbos.  I am writing it down quickly before that understanding all leaks out of my brain (again).  (I feel like Bones in the Star Trek episode "Spock's Brain", who went from "Even a child could do it!" to "It's impossible!" in 10 short minutes.  If you don't know what I am talking about... oh well.)  All of this is taken from the Mishna Brura's hakdama to siman 243; see there for elucidation and, of course, lots more details.

I find there are two main sources of confusion in that siman.  First, the word "s'chirus" (renting/leasing/etc) sometimes means the topic in general of partnering with a goy to use your stuff on Shabbos to make money, and sometimes means on the the three ways in which that can happen.  Second, there are two external issues (maris ayin and havla'a) that implicitly affect the halacha l'ma'aseh, but aren't stated explicitly.  We also don't really have good English words that capture all the shades of meaning, so I am going to use the terms Chazal did; it's better to use an unfamiliar word that is clear than a familiar words that comes with all sorts of confusing baggage.

One of those external issues comes up right away.  For any partnering to be permissible, some of the partnering must be done outside of Shabbos.  That way the money made on Shabbos is said to be "nivla" (absorbed/swallowed) into the money made during the week.  How and why that works is a whole topic in and of itself; maybe we'll take that up later.  For now it is just a requirement; part of the EULA.

What are the three ways of partnering?  The first way just uses the money made to create the partnership; the profit is split.  The split doesn't have to be 50:50, just that no external money is involved and the profit is shared.  That is called "arisus" and is permissible because the goy is working for his own benefit.  The other two ways involve a fixed sum of external money that has nothing to do with the profits.  When that fee goes to the Jew it is called "s'chirus".  Basically the goy is paying the Jew a fee in consideration of which the goy is allowed to use the Jew's stuff.  The goy is clearly working for himself in that case and it is permitted.  When that fee goes to the goy it is called "kablanus".  Here the goy doesn't make more money if he works harder (the fee is fixed), so he is considered and agent of the Jew and so is forbidden.

Arrangements of arisus (and even sometimes s'chirus) may be forbidden in certain situations because of maris ayin (I told you it would play a factor).  That is, if the arrangement looks like kablanus, then that particular arrangement often becomes forbidden because onlookers will suspect that the goy is acting as an agent of the Jew and not for his own benefit.

You've seen the pictures of the earth taken from the moon?  You can tell the earth has seas, land masses, and clouds; not much more.  That's about the level of detail here.  At least now when you go learn siman 243 you'll have a basic idea of the players.  Enjoy!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...