Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Ma'aseh Avos Siman l'Banim

It not often that a simple Jew like myself knows the m'chaber of a sefer.  Rarer still that I get the opportunity to quote from his sefer.  The following story (in outline form; come to vasikin to discuss the details with the Ohr HaYom himself -- after davening, of course) is brought in the Ohr HaYom b'shem R' Reisman b'shem R' Kanievsky:
A large sum of cash in an unmarked envelope was found and it was paskened that the finder could keep the money.  The finder, who is a hatzala volunteer, was called to help a man having an apparent heart attack.  While helping, it came out that the heart attack was really an anxiety attack because of losing a huge sum of cash in an unmarked envelope; he had just come back from America collecting to pay for his daughter's chasuna.  The sum mentioned was exactly what the hatzala volunteer had found, so he returned the money and all was well.
So far so good, but then R' Kanievsky paskened that the man still owed ma'aser on the original find because he really had owned the money. It is true that that he acted beyond the letter of the law in returning the lost money, but that didn't change his ma'aser obligation. R' Kanievsky's proof? From Avraham Avinu who gave back all the booty to melech S'dom, but still paid ma'aer on said booty.
R' Reisman had a difficulty in understanding the p'sak because in Avraham Avinu's case the booty really was his; fair and square. In our case, however, while the money did belong to the finder, it was only because the halacha rules that way when the owner cannot be determined by signs or seals on the money itself.
 While I normally would not weigh in to a discussion among such great people, in this case I wish to to no more than offer a dimension of understanding to R' Kanievsky's p'sak.  In the sefer Emes l'Yaakov (R' Yaakov Kamenetsky on chumash) asks why Avraham Avinu gave back the people to melech S'dom.  He answers that Avraham Avinu held that since the war was won only by miraculous help from heaven.  Therefore, our illustrious ancestor reasoned, the booty was not his -- even al pi din.  That being the case, the example from Avraham Avinu is a perfect match to our case.

Of course an understanding of the true nature of the Avos is way beyond us.  Even to really understand the depth of thought of R' Kanievsky and R' Reisman.  But we can take their lessons and words and apply them to our daily lives.  That's a real living Torah.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...
Post a Comment
Read more