Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Ha'aros from CCK Yarchei Kallah 5771, Day One

While these notes have often been mussar related, a d'var torah is a d'var torah.  I always get a lot out of the Yarchei Kallah run every year by the Chicago Community Kollel and I thought it would be worth sharing some of the chidushim.  Note: I discuss and confirm these with R' Zucker, the Rosh Kollel and magid shiur.

First Day's Chidush
"p'sik reisha" -- literally "sever the head".  The expression comes from the (seemingly bizarre) custom they had to use a chicken head for a toy.  The gemara notes, "p'sik reisha lo yamus?!" -- if you sever the [chicken's] head, won't it die?  The term "p'sik reisha" is used in halacha regarding a malacha that was done as a side effect of another malacha.  The standard example is dragging a bench across hard ground on Shabbos.  If the bench is light, then the dragging may or may not cause a furrow, which would be the malacha of plowing if done with intention.  We pasken that since the furrow was an unintentional side effect of dragging the bench, dragging a light bench is permitted.  Why specifically a light bench?  If the bench is heavy, the dragging will certainly cause a furrow to be dug; ie, the furrow is said to be a "p'sik reisha".  In that case, since the malacha is an inevitable (albeit unintended) consequence of the action, then the action is forbidden.  There is one exception: the "famous" position of the Aruch, that even though an result is inevitable, if the result is undesirable ("lo nicha lei"), then the Auch holds that the primary action is still permitted.  That being the case, we can make an interesting distinction in our case of cutting off a chicken's head to make a toy.  If the chicken is a laying hen, then the death of the chicken is certainly undesirable.  If, on the other hand, the chicken is destined for a Friday night s'uda anyway, its death is a side benefit.  It would come out, according to the Aruch, that if the kid really needs a new toy on Shabbos and all you have available is two chickens, pick the laying hen.  While we don't really paken like the Aruch, we do use him as a "snif" -- an extra reason to permit something.  Good thing to know if the kid is really throwing a world class tantrum and your wife is away at a shiur.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...