Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Takanas HaShavim for Property, Kim Li, Muchzak

Here's something really cool I discovered tonight.  I have a Hebrew keyboard on my Android phone (no, that's neither cool nor a new discovery tonight).  I was looking for some help in understanding the meta-halachic concept of "kim li".  I'd only heard it, so I didn't even know how to spell it, certainly not what it meant.  (Again, not cool new discovery for me tonight; my ignorance knows few bounds.)  For kicks I typed "קים לי" into my Google app on my phone, and ... LO AND BEHOLD! there is a Hebrew Wikipedia page all about "קים לי"!  (Sigh... YES!  That's my new cool discovery.)

Now gather 'round and I'll tell you how this all started.

I heard a shiur from R' Fuerst, shilt"a, on another choshen mishpat question.  Shimon built a new 10 story office building.  A very successful endeavor, as all the office space was leased even before the building was finished.  As Shimon is giving the building one last inspection before the grand opening,  the owner of the neighboring empty lot -- we'll call him Reuvein -- drops by and drops a little rain onto Shimon's parade.  Reuvein informs Shimon that his beautiful new building encroaches on his empty lot to the tune of 30 cm (approximately one foot; yes, I know that 30cm is 11.8110236 inches, but 30 cm has at best only two significant figures and 11.8110236 to two significant figures is 12 in which is one foot.  So there.)  Shimon is quite apologetic and wants to immediately rectify the completely unintentional wrong that Reuvein has suffered.  Shimon offers to have the property appraised and will pay Ruevein top dollar for his lost foot of property.  Reuvein, however, stands his ground  (foot ... stands... get it?) and demands that Shimon return his property; ie, that Shimon shave 30 cm off his new office building.  That's 30 cm time 10 floors!  Reuvein then says... of course, if you don't want to essentially tear down your building, you can appease me by giving one one floor of your new building (which already has tenants). Shimon is flabbergasted; Reuvein stands his ground (you can't over use a pun).  What's the halacha?

The Torah ha'K'dosha says that stolen property must be returned, if possible.  Only if the property has been consumed or otherwise lost is one allowed to return the item's value instead of the item itself.  However, Chazal wanted to make it easier for a thief to do t'shuvah, so they decreed that if it would be onerous to return the stolen object (such as a beam built into a building), then the thief could return the value instead.  This policy is known as "takanas ha'shavim".  Sounds like Shimon is right.

Not so fast.  The gemara says that takanas hashavim does not apply to real property, only to movable property.  Basically, property can't be stolen because it is always right there.  So Reuvein is right.

Not so fast.  The Mabit says that means when property is intentionally stolen, then the property -- not it's value -- must be returned.  However, if the theft was unintentional, as in our case, then takanas hashavim kicks in and the value may be returned, instead.  The Aruch HaShulchan agrees.  Sounds like Shimon is right.

Not so fast.  The Mishna l'Melech and Erech Shai disagree; they hold that real property must always be returned; no ifs, ands, buts, nor equal value in cash.  Now what?  We have a machlokes ha'poskim with no clear consensus.  Now comes קים לי/kim li!  When it comes to Choshen Mishpat and there is a machlokes ha'pokim, the one who is "muchzak" -- that is, has control of the item in question -- has a right to say, "It is clear to me that the poskim who rule in my favor are right."  That works because in order to take something of value from a muchzak, you need a proof; aka, ha'motzi mei'chaveiro, alav ha'raiya.  (A nice synopsis in English is available here.)

Great!  Wait... who's the muchzak?  It is Reuvein and his property, or Shimon and his building?

In case you are interested, Shimon was able to keep his building intact and was only required to pay Reuvein fair market value for his property.  Besides all the cool concepts this case brings out, it also brings out the confidence we have in the Truth of our Torah.  The expression "put your money where you mouth is" means that you can tell if someone believes what he is saying if he is willing to invest his own money in it.  Orthodox Jews are constantly called to invest their entire portfolio -- monetary and spiritual -- in their beliefs.  And we do.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Sometimes a Food Loses Its Identity When It Loses Its Bracha; Sometimes It Doesn't

Let's start with a question: Why are We Allowed to Drink Coffee and Whiskey Made by Non-Jews?  Before you ask,"Why would I think that I shouldn't be able to drink whiskey and coffee made by non-Jews?", I'll tell you. Simple, we all know that Chazal made a decree -- known as בישול עכו''ם/bishul akim -- that particular foods cooked by non-Jews are forbidden.  There are basically two criteria that determines if a dish falls into this category:
Is not consumed raw.Fit for a royal banquet. Cooked carrots, therefore, are not a problem since they can be eaten raw (I actually prefer them that way).  Baked beans are find because the are not prestigious enough.  (For great synopsis of the laws, see the article on the Star-K site, FOOD FIT FOR A KING, by Rabbi Moshe Heinemann, shlita.)  There are lots of cool questions and details (baked potatoes are prestigious, does that make even potato chips and issue?) which are for another time.  Clearly, though, both coffee an…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…