Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: How Connected Does a Patch Need to Be In Order to Be Considered Part of the Garment?

Another catchy title and topic brought to you by masechta Keilim.  I was a chubby kid, so  Mom bought my pants in the "husky" section (hated that word, by the way).  Husky sizes were more expensive, so she also bought them long; so the knees wore through my pants long before I outgrew them.  (Fat little boy in wide jeans with rolled up legs -- got the picture?)  Mom was not a top seamstress, but those were the days of iron on patches.  Mom even eventually learned to iron them on to the inside of the pant leg (just turn it inside out first), so it wasn't so embarrassing.  The patch I mean; they were still husky size with rolled up legs.  (She must have bought them really big, because I don't remember them ever wearing jeans with less that two inches of faded denim cuff showing.)

But imagine she had sown them, and that we had lived during the times of the Beis HaMikdash; and... oh yeah... that I had been Jewish.  When would that patch have been attached enough that the garment would become one as far as tuma goes?

Let's start where everyone agrees and then work our way to the fringes (28:7).  If the patch is only attached (by sewing; I don't think they had iron-on patches at the time of the mishna) on only one side in such a way that it does not cover the hole in normal use of the garment, then everyone agrees that the patch is not considered part and parcel of the garment.  That is, if the garment was from a dead guy, the patch remains tahor.  Likewise, if both garment and patch are tahor, then a rat curls up and dies on this patch, the garment remains tahor.  If two opposing sides of the patch are attached, then everyone agrees that the patch is now considered part of the garment; their lot is cast together with respect to t'hara and tuma.  Now the fun begins.

Suppose the patch is sewn along two adjoining edges.  -- Aside: the mishna calls this "like the Greek letter gamma (Γ). Why the sages chose to describe this situation with a Greek letter instead of the Hebrew dales (ד), I just don't know; but they did. -- In that case we have a machlokes (shocking, I know).  R' Akiva says that's good enough, the Sages say "nuh-uh" (in Aramaic, of course).

We aren't finished, though.  R' Yehuda says hang on here just one cotton picking minute!  When we said that one side is not good enough, that's only for a garment that has no direction; such as a shawl or scarf.  Why?  Because then the stitching of the patch might be sometimes on top (and therefore cover the hole) and sometimes on the bottom (and therefore the hole is there and open in front of the Good Lord and everybody).  If, however, we are talking about pants or a shirt, which can only be worn in one orientation, then stitched along the top is a good connection, but stitched along the bottom is as good as not sewn at all (more or less).

All this is for square patches.  How this works for rectangular, circular, and other odd shapes is left as an exercise for the interested reader.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...
Post a Comment
Read more