Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Using Electric Lights In Chanuka Menorah -- Probably Not a Great Idea

Spoiler alert: We are not going to come to a conclusion about whether one fulfills his obligation to light Chanuka lights using electric lamps.  On the other hand, we are going to have a lot of fun along the way.

Minchas Shlomo T'nina 58:7 is all about this topic.  Let's first set some basic principles.  Using electricity to heat a tungsten filament to incandescence is halachically equivalent to lighting a fire.  You can certainly (even l'chatchila according to many poskim) use an electric light (the old fashioned ones... with a filament, not florescent -- including CFLs -- and certainly not LEDs) for havdala.  Someone who turns on an electric light  (the old fashioned ones... with a filament, though maybe not florescent nor LEDs) on Shabbos has earned himself a chatas; that is he has violated the prohibition of making fire m'di'oraisa. (Don't try that at home, kids.)  The question of using electric lamps for Chanuka has nothing to do with whether or not screwing a  Christmas tree bulb into an electric menorah is making fire; it is.  But there are a whole lot of other questions to address.

First of all: the miracle was that one day's worth of oil lasted for eight days.  Using a filament is not similar to that at all, since the filament is not consumed.  Good question; needs more investigation.

So maybe you need a combustible fuel.  Can you fulfill the mitzvah by burning wood?  Imagine little wooden matchsticks that are made out of some kind of wood that will burn for 1/2 hour or so; ie, the shiur required for the lights to be burning.  It is certainly fire.  Moreover, even though the miracle was with oil, our sages have not required the use of oil.  Olive oil is best, according to some poskim, though others prefer our wax candles because of the clear, bright flame; but everyone agrees that any kind of candle or oil or other flammable liquid with a wick is acceptable.  But maybe it at least needs to be similar to the menorah in the beis ha'mikdash in that it uses a fuel other than the wick.  Good question; needs more investigation.

While we're on that topic... what about using oil without a wick?  Just lighting the surface of the oil (or kerosene or whatever) certainly does not fulfill the mitzvah, because the mitzvah requires a flame, not a torch.  However, by floating a small plate with the thin tube stuck through the middle, you can get the oil drawn up that tube and light it.  Single flame, uses oil.  However, the Chidushei HaRim says that they cut the wicks very thin (1/8 normal thickness) to make the oil last longer; the miracle according to him was that the lamps burned as brightly as if the wicks were full.  From that is seems that the wicks were part of the miracle, so maybe there needs to be a wick.  Good question; needs more investigation.

Since we're talking about the menorah in the Beis HaMikdash, the Torah introduces the mitzvah lighting the menorah in parshas b'ha'alos'cha -- literally, to cause to go up, not to light.  The mitzvah is to keep the source of ignition held on the lamps until the flame goes up.  Maybe, therefore, the mitzvah of Chanuka requires a flame and not just fire.  Good question; needs more investigation.

R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach, ztz"l, ends this ma'amar (which is actually transcribed from his handwritten notes for giving the shiur in yeshiva during Chanuka one year) with this:
All of this I have written only to arouse one to the issues involved in this question.  May it be HaShem's Will to enlighten us constantly with His Torah and may we merit days of light and rejoicing.  There is no joy like the dissolution of doubts.
Amein.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...