Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Understanding How "ha'motzi mei'chaveiro, alav haraya" Works

Since I brought up the topic of "ha'motzi mei'chaveiro, alav haraya" (it is the claimant's responsibility to bring proof), I thought it might be fun to spend some time on it.  There is a discussion among our sages for the source of this concept.  R' Shimon bar Nachmani says it is a "g'zeiras hakasuv" (divine decree).  No logic to it, just the way it is.  Not that it is illogical, mind you; just that logic isn't relevant.  The earth goes around the sun once every 365¼ days (approximately); atoms are comprised of protons, neutrons, and electrons.  Neither logical nor illogical, just is. I can handle that.

Rav Ashi disagrees and says: Why do I need a pasuk?  It's logical; a person who is in pain goes to a doctor.  This Rav Ashi bothered me for weeks.  I couldn't quite put by finger on it, but something about the tzu shtel just bothered me.  Somehow having playing a tug of war with someone who has my stuff doesn't seem the same as having appendicitis and going to the doctor.  I asked around and basically got one of two answers (neither helpful):
  1. it's pshut; what's your question?
  2. hmm... interesting; that is strange.
The first was unhelpful davka because I couldn't explain (even to myself) what the problem was, the second didn't help because I wanted an answer, not reassurance that it was a good question.  So I just kept the question on my mind, waiting for something to gel.  I find it helps sometimes to just let a question sit; don't force an explanation, just wait and see what happens.

What happened was I heard an explanation of another gemara that discussed a case where someone threw his vase off a roof and before it hit the ground someone smashed the vase.  The p'sak fo the gemara was that the smasher was not obligated to pay because from the time it left the roof it was considered already broken.  Various m'forshim ask why the gemara needs to stretch like this to find an explanation.   Why not just say that when he threw the vase off the roof he was obviously declaring it ownerless and that's why the smasher is patur?  R' Shimon Shkop answers that the dinim of hefker (making something ownerless) and the dinim of hezek (damages) are different.  Since there is (say) a 90% chance the vase will break, the vase is considered broken.  However, since there is a 10% chance the vase won't break, you can't say with certainty that the owner gave up on his property.  Even though the property is not going back to the hapless original order in any case, the principle still applies.  Ah-hah, I thought!  Nice use of "ha'motzi mei'chaveiro, alav haraya".

On the heels of that thought was what bothered by the tzu shtell of going to the doctor.  I thought Chazal were discussing how to get my property back; they're not.  Rather, Chazal are informing us that "ha'motzi mei'chaveiro, alav haraya" is one factor is determining the actual ownership of an item.  How to get the object to its proper owner is a completely different question.

As usual, the problem resolved by looking at the world as Chazal do.  That's a lot of work, having grown up in America and being fed a steady diet of the wrong way to look at the world.  Live and learn.


Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…

Thought for the Day: Prayer II -- How?

Now that we know that the obligation to pray is nothing more (nor less!) than a divine decree, we are going to also need instructions from heaven on how to implement that decree.  I cannot stress enough how important it is to have instruction from heaven how to implement heavenly decrees.  One only needs to look at the shambles that one modern ism has made of the very important Torah principle of תיקון עולם/improving and fixing the world.  They have taken words out of context and used them to support their own nefarious schemes.  (To the point that Google Translate actually translates -- not transliterates -- תיקון עולם as Tikkun Olam.  Amelia Bedelia would be proud; we are not amused.

The Torah teaches us how to pray in two complementary fashions.  One is the way in which the concept is presented as an obligation, the other is by giving us examples of how to practically implement those instructions.

The obligation is introduced in the second paragraph of "sh'ma" -- וּלְ…