Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Understanding How "ha'motzi mei'chaveiro, alav haraya" Works

Since I brought up the topic of "ha'motzi mei'chaveiro, alav haraya" (it is the claimant's responsibility to bring proof), I thought it might be fun to spend some time on it.  There is a discussion among our sages for the source of this concept.  R' Shimon bar Nachmani says it is a "g'zeiras hakasuv" (divine decree).  No logic to it, just the way it is.  Not that it is illogical, mind you; just that logic isn't relevant.  The earth goes around the sun once every 365¼ days (approximately); atoms are comprised of protons, neutrons, and electrons.  Neither logical nor illogical, just is. I can handle that.

Rav Ashi disagrees and says: Why do I need a pasuk?  It's logical; a person who is in pain goes to a doctor.  This Rav Ashi bothered me for weeks.  I couldn't quite put by finger on it, but something about the tzu shtel just bothered me.  Somehow having playing a tug of war with someone who has my stuff doesn't seem the same as having appendicitis and going to the doctor.  I asked around and basically got one of two answers (neither helpful):
  1. it's pshut; what's your question?
  2. hmm... interesting; that is strange.
The first was unhelpful davka because I couldn't explain (even to myself) what the problem was, the second didn't help because I wanted an answer, not reassurance that it was a good question.  So I just kept the question on my mind, waiting for something to gel.  I find it helps sometimes to just let a question sit; don't force an explanation, just wait and see what happens.

What happened was I heard an explanation of another gemara that discussed a case where someone threw his vase off a roof and before it hit the ground someone smashed the vase.  The p'sak fo the gemara was that the smasher was not obligated to pay because from the time it left the roof it was considered already broken.  Various m'forshim ask why the gemara needs to stretch like this to find an explanation.   Why not just say that when he threw the vase off the roof he was obviously declaring it ownerless and that's why the smasher is patur?  R' Shimon Shkop answers that the dinim of hefker (making something ownerless) and the dinim of hezek (damages) are different.  Since there is (say) a 90% chance the vase will break, the vase is considered broken.  However, since there is a 10% chance the vase won't break, you can't say with certainty that the owner gave up on his property.  Even though the property is not going back to the hapless original order in any case, the principle still applies.  Ah-hah, I thought!  Nice use of "ha'motzi mei'chaveiro, alav haraya".

On the heels of that thought was what bothered by the tzu shtell of going to the doctor.  I thought Chazal were discussing how to get my property back; they're not.  Rather, Chazal are informing us that "ha'motzi mei'chaveiro, alav haraya" is one factor is determining the actual ownership of an item.  How to get the object to its proper owner is a completely different question.

As usual, the problem resolved by looking at the world as Chazal do.  That's a lot of work, having grown up in America and being fed a steady diet of the wrong way to look at the world.  Live and learn.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…