Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Paying a Worker Who Steals from You

Paying for weddings is an interesting business, but here's a new issue... the father (who was paying for the meal) decided he wanted to make his guests even more comfortable with the already well supervised kashrus by hiring an independent mashgiach.  So far, so good.  At the end of the evening, the caterer (who owned the hall) told him that several cases of chicken had been stolen.  This caterer, however, had cameras set up to video the chasuna -- including the kitchen area.  He invited the father to watch the videos with him to help him identify the thief.  By this time you may have already guessed the thief's identity: the mashgiach!  They called in the mashgiach, who very embarrassedly admitted his crime; "I am not making enough to support my family and I knew you (the father) could well afford a couple of cases of chickens and thought you wouldn't even miss them!"  He (the mashgiach) was correct on the first count and wrong on the second count.  The chickens were returned; no harm, no foul (since they found the fowl).  Case closed.

Except the mashgiach now wanted to be paid for his hasgacha.  The father blew a gasket, "I wanted an honest, G-d fearing supervisor!  Get out!"  After he calmed down, however, he decided that he better ask just to make sure.  The question went to R' Eliashiv, ztz"l.  Both his analysis and the resulting p'sak are enlightening.

First of all, said R' Eliashiv, every Jew has a "chezkas kashrus"/presumption of honesty.  Therefore, the father certainly has to pay for the time till the stealing occurred.  That is, even though he stole at (let's say) 10:00PM, that didn't retroactively change his status.  You don't have to hire him again, but till 10:00PM he was certainly fit for the job and needs to be paid.  What about after the robbery occurred?

Before we answer that, consider the following p'sak of the Shulchan Aruch (Choshen Mishpat 359:4): Even someone who is stealing to to save his life (ie, he is so poor that he can't afford even basic necessities), may only steal on condition that he plans to repay.  R' Moshe explains simply, the injunction "v'chai bahem"/you shall live by them (the laws of the Torah) means that one can and should transgress any law -- except the big three; murder, adultery, and public idolatry (such as christianity).  Of course, though, one needs to steal with intent to repay.

What if he can't repay?  He is so poor and knows is situation is unlikely to change; what then?  He is still permitted.  More than that, the target of the robbery has to help him!  After all, he himself has the mitzvah of tzedaka.

This mashgiach was not that poor, so none of that applies.  However, the final p'sak was that the mashgiach was due his full payment.  After all, the kitchen staff didn't know he was going to steal chickens, so they were extra careful around him and so he successfully carried out his mission.

None the less, I find it amazing and inspiring how far our Torah goes to find a z'chus/merit for every Jew.  Good thing to know as we approach the Yom HaDin.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק

Thought for the Day: David HaMelech's Five Stages of Finding HaShem In the World

Many of us "sing" (once you have heard what I call carrying a tune, you'll question how I can, in good conscience, use that verb, even with the quotation marks) Eishes Chayil before the Friday night Shabbos meal.  We feel like we are singing the praises of our wives.  In fact, I have also been to chasunas where the chasson proudly (sometimes even tearfully) sings Eishes Chayil to his new eishes chayil.  Beautiful.  Also wrong.  (The sentiments, of course, are not wrong; just a misunderstanding of the intent of the author of these exalted words.) Chazal (TB Brachos, 10a) tell us that when Sholmo HaMelech wrote the words "She opens her mouth Mwith wisdom; the torah of kindness is on her tongue", that he was referring to his father, Dovid HaMelech, who (I am continuing to quote Chazal here) lived in five worlds and sang a song of praise [to each].  It seems to me that "world" here means a perception of reality.  Four times Dovid had to readjust his perc