Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Women's Obligation to Hear Parshas Zachor

Over the last couple shalosh s'udos shmuesim, the rav at Ohr Yissochar has been discussing the topic of "somei'ach b'chelko".  One the questions he addressed was why the mishna defines that as ashirus (wealth); call it happy, call it calm... but calling it wealthy seems to be co-opting a perfectly good word for new meaning.  Whereas Western Society can't seem to describe anything the way it is (he's not deaf, he's hearing impaired; she's not short, she's height challenged), Chazal are honest till it hurts.  The rav brought us to understand that wealth is not measured simply by one's bank account balance, but you need to subtract off the outstanding obligation.  Someone who has 37.4 gazillion dollars in the bank, but has outstanding debts of 37.5 gazillion dollars is actually 0.1 gazillion dollars in the hole.  Someone who is happy with what he has is zero dollars in the hole; making him fabulously wealthy by modern accounting.

Rashi gives two reasons for the mitzvah to eat on the 9th of Tishrei: (1) to be better prepared for the upcoming fast; (2) to make him feel the hunger pangs more on Yom Kippur (thus increasing his s'char).  The reasons seem contradictory at first glance, but given our new understanding of ashirus it works very nicely.  Eating more certainly prepares one for the fast.  But having eaten more, he now needs to eat more; the more you have, the more you want.

The last few weeks I have been commuting to work on the bus and train; giving my an extra 1.5 hours or so a day to learn.  I am back on my bike now (or, sigh... was; snow coming tonight) and was really feeling the lack of time to learn.  That was enough to motivate me to finally figure out how to listen to shiurim with my phone.  Ah... I got to hear R' Fuerst's most recent Sunday morning shiur (available at psak.org); on the mitzvah of hearing parshas zachor.

Among the topics discussed was the obligation for a woman to go to shul to hear parshas zachor.  What do you know... it's a machlokes.  On the one hand, it seems to be a classic "mitzvas asei sh'zman grama"/positive time-bound mitzvah; hence patur.  On the other hand, "af hen b'oso ha'neis"/they were also included in the miracle; hence obligated.

There are big time poskim on both sides of the issue.  Particularly fascinating was how some arguments were used both ways.  For example, the patur sides notes that it is not the derech of women to fight in a war (no, we don't change our rules because America and Israel press women into military service, R' Fuerst noted).  On the other hand, milchemas Amaleik is a milchemes mitzvah, in which women are required to serve in support roles (while the men actually engage in battle); so they should be obligated.  One can also argue that "af hen b'oso ha'neis" specifically obligates them in mikra m'gila, to the exclusion of parshas zachor; hence patur.  On the other hand, perhaps parshas zachor is just an aspect of the constant obligation to wipe out the memory of Amaleik, so it's not a mitzvas asei sh'zman grama; hence obligated.

Whew.  Blessed by the One Who did not make me a woman.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Sometimes a Food Loses Its Identity When It Loses Its Bracha; Sometimes It Doesn't

Let's start with a question: Why are We Allowed to Drink Coffee and Whiskey Made by Non-Jews?  Before you ask,"Why would I think that I shouldn't be able to drink whiskey and coffee made by non-Jews?", I'll tell you. Simple, we all know that Chazal made a decree -- known as בישול עכו''ם/bishul akim -- that particular foods cooked by non-Jews are forbidden.  There are basically two criteria that determines if a dish falls into this category:
Is not consumed raw.Fit for a royal banquet. Cooked carrots, therefore, are not a problem since they can be eaten raw (I actually prefer them that way).  Baked beans are find because the are not prestigious enough.  (For great synopsis of the laws, see the article on the Star-K site, FOOD FIT FOR A KING, by Rabbi Moshe Heinemann, shlita.)  There are lots of cool questions and details (baked potatoes are prestigious, does that make even potato chips and issue?) which are for another time.  Clearly, though, both coffee an…

Thought for the Day: Prayer II -- How?

Now that we know that the obligation to pray is nothing more (nor less!) than a divine decree, we are going to also need instructions from heaven on how to implement that decree.  I cannot stress enough how important it is to have instruction from heaven how to implement heavenly decrees.  One only needs to look at the shambles that one modern ism has made of the very important Torah principle of תיקון עולם/improving and fixing the world.  They have taken words out of context and used them to support their own nefarious schemes.  (To the point that Google Translate actually translates -- not transliterates -- תיקון עולם as Tikkun Olam.  Amelia Bedelia would be proud; we are not amused.

The Torah teaches us how to pray in two complementary fashions.  One is the way in which the concept is presented as an obligation, the other is by giving us examples of how to practically implement those instructions.

The obligation is introduced in the second paragraph of "sh'ma" -- וּלְ…

Thought for the Day: Our Job Is השתדלות/Endeavor with All One’s Resources, Not Results

Forrest Gump is a sweet movie from the last century about a relatively clueless -- though quite loveable -- fellow who triggers several history changing/making events of the 20th century.  He also amasses a considerable fortune due to fortuitous stock purchases and business investments.  A model for success, no?

No.  In every event, every stock transaction, and every business investment... our relatively clueless -- though quite loveable -- protagonist is completely passive and simply the beneficiary of good/dumb luck/karma/being at the right place at the right time.  It is not that he is a bad role model, nor a role model for something bad.  He is just not a role model.  Like an ice cube in a glass.  When the glass is empty, the cube rests on the bottom.  When the glass is filled with water, the ice cube bobs to the top. The ice cube is neither good nor bad; it just is.

I recently saw an incredible back story about events leading up to the (long overdue and very much appreciated) rel…