Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Stolen Property -- Return the Object or Return Its Value?

If you take something that doesn't belong to you, you have to return it; right?  Well... not always.  The Torah reveals to us some interesting details in what are the appropriate actions to be taken in case one has erred and taken something that doesn't belong to him.

As an important aside, I'd like to take this opportunity to explain a detail in how I phrased that introduction. It is a mistake to say that the reason stealing is wrong, or eating pork is wrong, or tying a permanent knot on Shabbos is wrong is because the Torah says so.  Rather, we do them because HaShem -- our Creator, who therefore has the right to tell us what to do and how to do it -- told us not to do those things.  How do we know Ratzon HaShem?  HaShem has revealed that to us via His Torah.  How do we know that the Torah (Oral and Written) that we have today is an accurate revelation of His Will?  That's another question for another time.  The point is that the Torah is the medium by which we know Ratzon HaShem and not the source of rules that we slavishly follow.

When something is stolen, the first preference is always to return the stolen object intact to its rightful owner. There are three situations where one is forced into plan B, which is to reimburse the owner for the value of the object stolen.
  1. if the object has been changed; stolen wool woven into sweater, for example
  2. If the owner has given up hope of ever seeing his stuff again
  3. if it would be inordinately expensive for the robber to return the original object; a stolen beam has been built into a building, for example
Note that (1) and (3) are not the same.  In (1) the object itself has changed.  In our example, wool has been processed into yarn and then woven into a sweater; but the original wool is no more.  In (3), the object is intact and unchanged; in our example, the beam is there, but the building would have to be dismantled to get to it.

Interestingly, there are situations where the owner can suffer a big loss by having the object itself returned instead of its value.  Suppose Bob steals a truck load of matzah, for example, from Shmuly two weeks before Pesach.  Even though he returns it after Pesach, Shmuly is not a happy camper, but Bob will have fulfilled his obligation   Such is life.

According to all opinions, (1) is mi'di'oraisa, (3) is mi'd'rabanan and is known affectionately as תקנת השבים -- a rabbinic ordinance to exempt a robber from extra expenses that he might incur in returning the object that was enacted in order to remove that obstacle to a robber from doing t'shuva.  There is a machlokes about whether (2) is mi'di'oraisa or mi'd'rabanan.

You might be wondering how Chazal can allow the robber to keep something that the Torah says has to be returned.  If you don't know and you were not wondering... shame on you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…

Thought for the Day: Prayer II -- How?

Now that we know that the obligation to pray is nothing more (nor less!) than a divine decree, we are going to also need instructions from heaven on how to implement that decree.  I cannot stress enough how important it is to have instruction from heaven how to implement heavenly decrees.  One only needs to look at the shambles that one modern ism has made of the very important Torah principle of תיקון עולם/improving and fixing the world.  They have taken words out of context and used them to support their own nefarious schemes.  (To the point that Google Translate actually translates -- not transliterates -- תיקון עולם as Tikkun Olam.  Amelia Bedelia would be proud; we are not amused.

The Torah teaches us how to pray in two complementary fashions.  One is the way in which the concept is presented as an obligation, the other is by giving us examples of how to practically implement those instructions.

The obligation is introduced in the second paragraph of "sh'ma" -- וּלְ…