Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Stolen Property -- Return the Object or Return Its Value?

If you take something that doesn't belong to you, you have to return it; right?  Well... not always.  The Torah reveals to us some interesting details in what are the appropriate actions to be taken in case one has erred and taken something that doesn't belong to him.

As an important aside, I'd like to take this opportunity to explain a detail in how I phrased that introduction. It is a mistake to say that the reason stealing is wrong, or eating pork is wrong, or tying a permanent knot on Shabbos is wrong is because the Torah says so.  Rather, we do them because HaShem -- our Creator, who therefore has the right to tell us what to do and how to do it -- told us not to do those things.  How do we know Ratzon HaShem?  HaShem has revealed that to us via His Torah.  How do we know that the Torah (Oral and Written) that we have today is an accurate revelation of His Will?  That's another question for another time.  The point is that the Torah is the medium by which we know Ratzon HaShem and not the source of rules that we slavishly follow.

When something is stolen, the first preference is always to return the stolen object intact to its rightful owner. There are three situations where one is forced into plan B, which is to reimburse the owner for the value of the object stolen.
  1. if the object has been changed; stolen wool woven into sweater, for example
  2. If the owner has given up hope of ever seeing his stuff again
  3. if it would be inordinately expensive for the robber to return the original object; a stolen beam has been built into a building, for example
Note that (1) and (3) are not the same.  In (1) the object itself has changed.  In our example, wool has been processed into yarn and then woven into a sweater; but the original wool is no more.  In (3), the object is intact and unchanged; in our example, the beam is there, but the building would have to be dismantled to get to it.

Interestingly, there are situations where the owner can suffer a big loss by having the object itself returned instead of its value.  Suppose Bob steals a truck load of matzah, for example, from Shmuly two weeks before Pesach.  Even though he returns it after Pesach, Shmuly is not a happy camper, but Bob will have fulfilled his obligation   Such is life.

According to all opinions, (1) is mi'di'oraisa, (3) is mi'd'rabanan and is known affectionately as תקנת השבים -- a rabbinic ordinance to exempt a robber from extra expenses that he might incur in returning the object that was enacted in order to remove that obstacle to a robber from doing t'shuva.  There is a machlokes about whether (2) is mi'di'oraisa or mi'd'rabanan.

You might be wondering how Chazal can allow the robber to keep something that the Torah says has to be returned.  If you don't know and you were not wondering... shame on you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…