Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: No G'zeira l'G'zeira

I once attended a workshop for Motorola employees on interpersonal relationships in the work place.  The speaker wanted to make an impression on us that it is very important to consider how you say things as well as what you say.  His example to demonstrate the difference in how the same message will received was:

  • Honey, you have a timeless beauty.
  • You have a face that could stop a clock.
I bring this up because it is oft said that Chazal don't gozer g'zeiros l'g'zeiros (do not make safety precautions on top of safety precautions).  Yet, when confronted with examples that appear to be just that, the answer is usually, "Well... that's included in the original g'zeira."  Is that just a way of saying the same thing in a more palatable format?  (Hint: No; but we'll need to do some work to understand why not.)

One classic example is with respect to meat and milk.  The Torah assurs cooking meat (cow/sheep/goat) with milk.  Chazal made two g'zeiros: One not to eat fowl cooked with milk, one not to eat cold meat with cold milk.  Using the rule of no g'zeira l'g'zeira, shouldn't I expect that eating a sandwich of turkey cold cuts with cheese whiz should be ok?  Of course we know that is also assur; the question is why.  (If you are holding by eating cheeze whiz, you are patur from mitzvos and probably drooling on yourself now.)

Another example (that I recently saw and is what prompted this TftD) is that the Torah assurs completing a keili (tool/utensil/clothing/...) on Shabbos.  Chazal (see 299:7) made a g'zeira to not move a candelabra made of multiple pieces on Shabbos.  The Rema, however, notes that even if it isn't made of pieces but just has grooves so it looks like it's made of pieces, then it is still muktzeh.  Again, doesn't that seem like a g'zeira on a g'zeira?

The resolution is that there are two basics types of g'zeiros.  There are g'zeiros to protect me from accidentally slipping into forbidden activities.  Not reading by candlelight on Shabbos is an example.  Chazal were protecting me; it is very easy to forget oneself while learning and reach to tilt the lamp.  They did not, however, forbid me from picking up a book in front of a candelabra out of a concern that I might come to read and then I might come to tilt that lamp.  That surely would be a g'zeira l'g'zeira.

Other g'zeiros, however, are to protect others from drawing the wrong conclusions about what is permitted when they see me doing something.  The two examples above are in that category.  When someone sees me eating a cold cut sandwich, they can't tell whether it's turkey pastrami or beef pastrami.  When someone sees me moving a candelabra, they can't tell with it's really made of pieces or just has grooves that look likes it's made of pieces.  Not a g'zeira to a g'zeira, but included in the original g'zeira to fulfill the original intent of that g'zeira.

I don't have a pithy ending, sorry.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…

Thought for the Day: Prayer II -- How?

Now that we know that the obligation to pray is nothing more (nor less!) than a divine decree, we are going to also need instructions from heaven on how to implement that decree.  I cannot stress enough how important it is to have instruction from heaven how to implement heavenly decrees.  One only needs to look at the shambles that one modern ism has made of the very important Torah principle of תיקון עולם/improving and fixing the world.  They have taken words out of context and used them to support their own nefarious schemes.  (To the point that Google Translate actually translates -- not transliterates -- תיקון עולם as Tikkun Olam.  Amelia Bedelia would be proud; we are not amused.

The Torah teaches us how to pray in two complementary fashions.  One is the way in which the concept is presented as an obligation, the other is by giving us examples of how to practically implement those instructions.

The obligation is introduced in the second paragraph of "sh'ma" -- וּלְ…