Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: No G'zeira l'G'zeira

I once attended a workshop for Motorola employees on interpersonal relationships in the work place.  The speaker wanted to make an impression on us that it is very important to consider how you say things as well as what you say.  His example to demonstrate the difference in how the same message will received was:

  • Honey, you have a timeless beauty.
  • You have a face that could stop a clock.
I bring this up because it is oft said that Chazal don't gozer g'zeiros l'g'zeiros (do not make safety precautions on top of safety precautions).  Yet, when confronted with examples that appear to be just that, the answer is usually, "Well... that's included in the original g'zeira."  Is that just a way of saying the same thing in a more palatable format?  (Hint: No; but we'll need to do some work to understand why not.)

One classic example is with respect to meat and milk.  The Torah assurs cooking meat (cow/sheep/goat) with milk.  Chazal made two g'zeiros: One not to eat fowl cooked with milk, one not to eat cold meat with cold milk.  Using the rule of no g'zeira l'g'zeira, shouldn't I expect that eating a sandwich of turkey cold cuts with cheese whiz should be ok?  Of course we know that is also assur; the question is why.  (If you are holding by eating cheeze whiz, you are patur from mitzvos and probably drooling on yourself now.)

Another example (that I recently saw and is what prompted this TftD) is that the Torah assurs completing a keili (tool/utensil/clothing/...) on Shabbos.  Chazal (see 299:7) made a g'zeira to not move a candelabra made of multiple pieces on Shabbos.  The Rema, however, notes that even if it isn't made of pieces but just has grooves so it looks like it's made of pieces, then it is still muktzeh.  Again, doesn't that seem like a g'zeira on a g'zeira?

The resolution is that there are two basics types of g'zeiros.  There are g'zeiros to protect me from accidentally slipping into forbidden activities.  Not reading by candlelight on Shabbos is an example.  Chazal were protecting me; it is very easy to forget oneself while learning and reach to tilt the lamp.  They did not, however, forbid me from picking up a book in front of a candelabra out of a concern that I might come to read and then I might come to tilt that lamp.  That surely would be a g'zeira l'g'zeira.

Other g'zeiros, however, are to protect others from drawing the wrong conclusions about what is permitted when they see me doing something.  The two examples above are in that category.  When someone sees me eating a cold cut sandwich, they can't tell whether it's turkey pastrami or beef pastrami.  When someone sees me moving a candelabra, they can't tell with it's really made of pieces or just has grooves that look likes it's made of pieces.  Not a g'zeira to a g'zeira, but included in the original g'zeira to fulfill the original intent of that g'zeira.

I don't have a pithy ending, sorry.


Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…