Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Freedom of Religion is Freedom From Religion

Imagine a news article on a day care center that starts as follows:
An investigation of XYZ Childcare Center, used by many in our community has found shocking evidence of neglect and abuse.  There is a total lack of adult supervision.  What toys and other educational resources are available are taken by the bigger and stronger children.  There is also substance abuse among the children, making them dangerous to themselves and others.  Many children have been found beaten to the point of broken limbs and even death.  When parents were asked if they had any idea of the conditions, they replied that they didn't understand, but since it was a licensed facility they felt they had no right to question the care.  Parents even told their children that they should just accept whatever was done to them.
Pretty over the top, I know.  Maybe believable, but only barely; more like something you'd read in a piece of fiction trying to make a point.  Now imagine I told you the author ended with:
Of course, we are not in any way suggesting that this center be closed or even forced to change their administration of the facility.  We support their right to run their organization any way they want.  Moreover, we fully understand why parents want to send their children there.  We simply felt it was important to make public why we don't send our children there.
Ok; that's ridiculous.  No one in their right mind would support such an awful institution!  Moreover, no reputable news service would publish such an outlandish article.  An article that details criminal behavior at the institution and then supports their right to continue that criminal behavior!?  That is obviously outlandish and unbelievable.

Tch, tch... did you forget where we live?  That article was published by CNN.  The article wasn't about a day care center, but about religion.  The arguments were the same old stale canards always leveled by people who are interested only in justifying their own behavior and then singing "la la la la la... I can't hear you" to be sure they don't have to deal with any facts.  What shocked me, though, was that last paragraph supporting the right to religion.  If they really believed what they were saying about the problems with religion, there is no way they could support and endorse it for others.  Unless, of course, they are really cruel, self-centered bullies who want what they can get any way they can get it.  Ah.  Now I'm the one forgetting where we live.


Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Sometimes a Food Loses Its Identity When It Loses Its Bracha; Sometimes It Doesn't

Let's start with a question: Why are We Allowed to Drink Coffee and Whiskey Made by Non-Jews?  Before you ask,"Why would I think that I shouldn't be able to drink whiskey and coffee made by non-Jews?", I'll tell you. Simple, we all know that Chazal made a decree -- known as בישול עכו''ם/bishul akim -- that particular foods cooked by non-Jews are forbidden.  There are basically two criteria that determines if a dish falls into this category:
Is not consumed raw.Fit for a royal banquet. Cooked carrots, therefore, are not a problem since they can be eaten raw (I actually prefer them that way).  Baked beans are find because the are not prestigious enough.  (For great synopsis of the laws, see the article on the Star-K site, FOOD FIT FOR A KING, by Rabbi Moshe Heinemann, shlita.)  There are lots of cool questions and details (baked potatoes are prestigious, does that make even potato chips and issue?) which are for another time.  Clearly, though, both coffee an…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…