Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: When To Ask Why in Gemara

One of the things I truly appreciated about physics is that it knew its boundaries.  "Physics answers how, not why", is a fundamental part of the catechism.  On the other hand, physics certainly does answer questions such as, "Why is the sky blue?"  That's because the question is not really a "why" question, it is a "how" question.  That is, one is really asking how it happens that the sky appears blue even though it is being bathed in (white) sunlight.  A "why" question would be, "Why do you want to know how the sky gets its blue color?"

Learning gemara is like that also.  There are questions  that one needs to ask just to get p'shat.  There are other questions that may be interesting, but they are tangential to the discussion at hand.  There are other questions that really have no place at all in learning.  Consider the following gemara:
R' Chanina bar Egil asked R' Chiya bar Abba why it doesn't say "tov" in the first rendition of the aseres ha'dibros, while it does say "tov" in the later rendition.  R' Chiya bar Abba responds, "Before you ask me why it doesn't say 'tov', you should ask me if it says 'tov', since I don't know if it says 'tov' or not.  [...] Shmuel bar Nachum said because the [first tablets] were destined to be broken.  And therefore what?  Rav Assi said because chas v'shalom there should be an interruption in good for Yisrael"  (Bava Kama 54b/55a)
The first question that needs to be asked is simply, "What "tov" are we talking about."  Rashi says that R' Chanina bar Egil is asking why the command to honor one's parents written on the second set of tablets adds, "u'l'ma'an yitav lach" (in order to benefit you).  That's is all you really need to know to understand p'shat in the gemara.

Here are some tangential questions: How is it possible that R' Chiya bar Abba didn't know what was written on the tablets?  What does it mean that breaking tablets with "tov" on them would cause an interruption in the good to Yisrael?  The gemara says that "tov" is missing, how does Rashi know that mean "yitav"?  Is there any other way to understand what "tov" the gemara is referencing?  (There is, btw; "tov" is gematria 17 and there are 17 more words in the second set than the first.  See ArtScroll gemara for more on that.)

Here is a question that has no place: "Since HaShem knew the first set were going to be broken, why did He give them at all?"  In fact, you can never ask a question about HaShem's motivation; that is beyond us.  You can, of course, ask what am I supposed to learn from the way HaShem did things.  That is a perfectly appropriate question.  For mussar seder, though; nor for gemara shiur.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…