Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Oral and Written Law are Inextricably Linked

I think most people know the famous physics equation, E = mc2. Whether or not you know (or even care) what it means, it would not occur to any sane person to suggest meanings for the symbols.  You are never going to hear the following:
I am a fundamentalist scientist.  I believe only the literal writings of Newton and Einstein, the Written Physics.  I know those old orthodox physicists have their own Oral Physics that interprets the symbols a certain way,  and according to their interpretation that is an equation that relates energy, mass, and the speed of light.  But we are not tied to old, dogmatic beliefs; especially claimed "oral traditions".  We are modern and have our own interpretation: 'E' means enlightenment, the double lines means, of course, stay between the lines, and mc2 means riding motorcycles in tandem.
That's obviously hogwash.  The same physicists who told you "E = mc2", also told you what it meant (or tried to; sigh...)  Even more profoundly stupid is to try to discuss the "Written Law" (torah sh'bichtav) divorced from the "Oral Law" (torah sh'b'al peh).  The Oral Law is not an interpretation of the Written Law!  They are one and the same with the, each appropriate to a different mode of communication.  One without the other is meaningless; or worse, a terrible distortion.

A few examples should suffice.  How about this?  The pronunciation of the letters and the vocalization of the words.  Small changes in either make big differences in Lashon HaKodesh.  My favorite example is "cheilev" (fats around the inner organs) versus "chalav" (milk).  Both spelled the same: ches, lamed, beis.  Without having a rebbi with an authentic chain of transmission, you would not know whether you are forbidden to eat a kid with its mother's milk or with the internal fats.  You wouldn't know if the internal fats or milk of domesticated animals is strictly forbidden.  The beauty of this example is that even context can't help.  No one has ever heard of a Jewish society that refrained from fried meats (not on religious grounds, anyway).  With nothing but an oral transmission, we all know what mixtures are forbidden and which fats are forbidden.

Even when you have context you are lost.  Vayikra 19:14 says, "Do not curse the deaf, nor put a stumbling block before the blind."  There actually is an issur d'oraisa of cursing a deaf peraon (even though he can't hear you).  On the other hand, there is no specific issur at all of putting a stone in the path of a blind person.  (You probably aren't going to get shishi on Shabbos, of course.)  That phrase means not to give someone advice that is unsuitable just because it will benefit you (even though it won't hurt him).

That is one reason that shtayim mikra v'echad targum -- reading the text of the parsha twice each week and its explanation once -- is so crucial to knowing about Judaism.  The Shulchan Aruch says that now a days since we don't understand targum so well (that was 400 years ago...), you can substitute Rashi (with some caveats; see the Mishna Brura there, siman 285).  Once you have clarity on how to properly read Chumash, then you can see the other m'forshim -- Ramban, S'porno, Ohr Chaim, Kli Yakar, and so forth as developing a deeper sense and appreciation for our Torah haK'dosha and you are drawn to love for HaKadosh Baruch Hu; the Author of reality.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…