Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Without an Externally Imposed Morality, Anything Goes

There is no zealot like an ex-smoker/alcoholic/etc.  I am no exception when it comes to the patently shallow and false slogans of the "modern" liberalism  -- especially the old slogans dressed up as new thoughts.  One of my favorites (so to speak) is, "if two people love each other, they should be allowed to be married; regardless of race, creed, or sex".  Note first how they start with something true (race and creed certainly have no bearing on the issue), and then add in their pork barrel of "or sex".  It is not difficult to get a chuckle and nod of agreement out of the way I say things with someone who agrees with me.  Last night, however, I was very gratified to have a calm and logical conversation about this usually explosive topic with a thoughtful and reasonable person who has bought into the party line; more precisely, was reared with the party line.

I first made sure that he appreciated that there is a distinction between the action and the person.  A person who does bad things is not (necessarily) a bad person.  (The opposite is also true, of course.  A person who does good things out of habit is not necessarily a good person; he is just safer to be around.)  I pointed out that my views and opinions are set by an external standard (the Torah), whereas his views are based on his own thoughts on the matter.  So, I said, "since they are your own opinions, you must also accept my right to my views, but you must also accept the view of someone who feels it is ok to marry his dog if he love it".  At this point, most people will cry out, "You are saying those men who marry men are the same as dogs?!?  How DARE you!!"  This person simply thought about the idea and agreed, "Right.  I find that personally distasteful, but I have no right to call that behavior immoral or even wrong."  Wow... a thoughtful and reasonable liberal!  Of course, he's only 14.... so there's still hope for him.  As Walt Kelly (in the guise of Pogo) said, "He who is conservative when younger has no heart; he who is liberal when he is older has no haid [sic]".  The boy has heart, and it looks like he has a brain as well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק

Thought for the Day: David HaMelech's Five Stages of Finding HaShem In the World

Many of us "sing" (once you have heard what I call carrying a tune, you'll question how I can, in good conscience, use that verb, even with the quotation marks) Eishes Chayil before the Friday night Shabbos meal.  We feel like we are singing the praises of our wives.  In fact, I have also been to chasunas where the chasson proudly (sometimes even tearfully) sings Eishes Chayil to his new eishes chayil.  Beautiful.  Also wrong.  (The sentiments, of course, are not wrong; just a misunderstanding of the intent of the author of these exalted words.) Chazal (TB Brachos, 10a) tell us that when Sholmo HaMelech wrote the words "She opens her mouth Mwith wisdom; the torah of kindness is on her tongue", that he was referring to his father, Dovid HaMelech, who (I am continuing to quote Chazal here) lived in five worlds and sang a song of praise [to each].  It seems to me that "world" here means a perception of reality.  Four times Dovid had to readjust his perc