Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: But Can You Make Kiddush With That Non-Kosher Wine You Are Drinking to Save Your Life?

Now that we know what bracha to make on non-kosher food, as detailed in this TftD, we are ready to address the original-ish question. (It is only "-ish" because that question was about water, which gets a resounding "no," but the question of using non-kosher wine is still open.) But, first, a joke.

A Jew is meeting with a non-Jew at the non-Jew's house while the non-Jew is having a snack of ham and wine. (The reaons for the meeting and why at the house of the non-Jew and why the non-Jew choose this moment to eat are all beyond the scope of this joke.) The non-Jew is cordial and offers the Jew some ham. "No thank you. We only eat kosher food." The non-Jew is a bit surprised (again, outside the scope of this joke), but still wants to be a good host. "Well, may I at least offer you some wine, then?" The Jew replies that we drink kosher wine. Now then non-Jew cannot contain himself, "So if there was only non-kosher food and wine available, you would starve to death rather than consume them?" "Oh, no," replies the Jew, "if it is a matter of life and death, then we may eat anything." Upon hearing those words, the non-Jew takes out a revolver, points it straight at the Jew's head and commands, "Pour yourself a glass of wine and drink it now!" The Jew does as ordered. The non-Jew, still with the gun pointed as the Jew's head, says, "Another!" The Jew complies. The non-Jew puts down his gun and starts smiling, "It was just a joke, my friend! The gun isn't even loaded!" The Jew is furious! The non-Jew says, "Please... it was just a joke!" The Jew replies, "And you couldn't have started your joke with the ham?!"

Now, usually you should make a דיוק in a joke, but this is me, who is well known to have little sense of humor. The דיוק here is that the Jew did not make a bracha before drinking the wine. That is correct. One would only make a bracha on non-kosher food consumed to save their life when it is the food itself that is saving their life. Here the Jew saved his life by following the orders of the non-Jew, but he was not actually in danger of dying from starvation. (Rema to 204:8)

Now back to our question: May one make kiddush on non-kosher wine that he is permitted to drink because he would otherwise die of starvation? But first some introductory remarks.

First, just to be absolutely clear: there is a Torah obligation to make kiddush for Shabbos. Chazal mandated that said kiddush should be said over wine. Second, there are three kinds of wine (for our purposes): (1) יין נסך/wine used for libations of idol worshippers (not as Google translated: Wine of the Nescafé 😆). (2) Jewish wine; ne'er touched by anyone except Torah-observant Jews. (3) סתם יינם/their (non-Jews') ordinary wine. There is a Torah prohibition to drink יין נסך. Chazal mandates that it is forbidden for us to drink סתם יינם.

I, of course, went to R' Fuerst to ask. The dayan told me, "Go see the Be'er Heitev on siman 272." (In case you are wondering, the Be'er Heitev is a commentary on the Shulchan Aruch that the Mishna Brurah inserted—along with the Sha'arei T'shuva—between the Shulchan Aruch and the Mishna Brura.) I frankly didn't know anyone even looked up there unless directed by the Mishnah Brurah himself, let alone quote one off the top of their head.

Anyway... the Be'er Heitev (sk 2, after discussing the more usual question of using wine that was left uncovered) brings two opinions about using סתם יינם for kiddush. The first opinion is that since the prohibition to drink סתם יינם came after the mandate to make kiddush on wine, it is permitted to (always) use סתם יינם for kiddush. The second opinion says that to use סתם יינם for kiddush is not a bracha at all; rather, it is blasphemy. We are stringent and pasken like the second opinion, but in our case of someone having permission to drink the סתם יינם to save his life, he could rely on that first opinion brought in the Be'er Heitev and actually make kiddush. (There is still no permission—even in a situation of starving to death—to use actual, Torah-prohibited יין נסך for kiddush.)

Epilogue: In case you are interested, I have a thought about that opinion that permits using סתם יינם for kiddush. The decree to forbid סתם יינם was mandated by Chazal to keep us from mixing with non-Jews in an overly friendly manner that could lead to intermarriage. Someone making kiddush is not likely to be with non-Jews in the first place, and even if he is, that is not a likely venue for intermarriage. That is why the order of the decrees is important. When they forbad drinking סתם יינם, there was already a decree on the books to use wine for kiddush. That lenient opinion holds that the mandate prohibiting סתם יינם never covered its use in kiddush (and havdala).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...