Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Bracha on Thinster's Coconut CookieThins

Here's another cookie bracha issue. (Another? Yes; the one to which this is another is TftD: Coolest Cookie.) I found these delicious cookies: Thinster's Coconut CookieThins. Really delicious. What's the problem? What's the bracha -- both before eating and after finishing.

What is the doubt? The cookies contain wheat flour. The rule is that any time a recipe include wheat (or barley, rye, oat, or spelt) flour, then the bracha is always בורא מיני מזונות because the five grains are never subordinate. That is, except when the flour is added only to give structure/consistency to the food but not taste. If the flour is only added for the structure, then the bracha is שהכל נהיה בדברו. Twizzlers is the famous example of that.

However, how do you know if they use flour in a product for taste or simply to give structure? In fact, they may not know themselves. They add the flour according to their secret recipe. Why do they add it? Because it sells.

The Star K has a criterion they use: If the flour is more than 25% of the product, then it is added for flavor and the bracha is בורא מיני מזונות. If the flour is less than 15% of the product, then it is added for flavor and the bracha is שהכל נהיה בדברו. As it turns out, there are (apparently) very few products that fall in the middle range. Getting the percentage is tricky (they have secret recipes, you know). The Star K has another guideline: If it is one of the first two ingredients, then it is for flavor. If it is fourth or more, then it is for structure. If it is third, you need the percentage. Flour is the third ingredient on Thinsters. Gotta love the sense of humor of the Creator.

Getting that information from the company, though, is nigh on impossible. I tried emailing the company and explaining this was for religious reasons and that I didn't want the recipe. I simply wanted to know why they added the flour, or even just the percentage. They eventually stopped answering my emails. Sigh...

This product is certified kosher by the O-U, so that was my next email. I went back and forth getting them the information they needed and then waited. Those cookies in my pantry, so tempting, but... 

Here was the answer: The ingredient list is: chocolate, coconut, flour, etc. However, the chocolate is not actually in the cookie, it is merely smeared as a thin layer on (the bottom of) the cookie. I hadn't thought about the implications of that detail. That means, though, that the cookie ingredients are: coconut, flour, etc. So flour is the second ingredient and the bracha בורא מיני מזונות.

That's the bracha rishona. What about the bracha acharona? To require an על המחיה, one needs to consume a k'zayis of flour in like 4 - 7 minutes. Since these cookies are small and the flour proportion also is relatively, eating two or three cookies is not enough to require an על המחיה. If you eat enough, probably with other things, then you would make a בורא נפשות.

I am so going to enjoy those cookies!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...