Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Bracha on Thinster's Coconut CookieThins

Here's another cookie bracha issue. (Another? Yes; the one to which this is another is TftD: Coolest Cookie.) I found these delicious cookies: Thinster's Coconut CookieThins. Really delicious. What's the problem? What's the bracha -- both before eating and after finishing.

What is the doubt? The cookies contain wheat flour. The rule is that any time a recipe include wheat (or barley, rye, oat, or spelt) flour, then the bracha is always בורא מיני מזונות because the five grains are never subordinate. That is, except when the flour is added only to give structure/consistency to the food but not taste. If the flour is only added for the structure, then the bracha is שהכל נהיה בדברו. Twizzlers is the famous example of that.

However, how do you know if they use flour in a product for taste or simply to give structure? In fact, they may not know themselves. They add the flour according to their secret recipe. Why do they add it? Because it sells.

The Star K has a criterion they use: If the flour is more than 25% of the product, then it is added for flavor and the bracha is בורא מיני מזונות. If the flour is less than 15% of the product, then it is added for flavor and the bracha is שהכל נהיה בדברו. As it turns out, there are (apparently) very few products that fall in the middle range. Getting the percentage is tricky (they have secret recipes, you know). The Star K has another guideline: If it is one of the first two ingredients, then it is for flavor. If it is fourth or more, then it is for structure. If it is third, you need the percentage. Flour is the third ingredient on Thinsters. Gotta love the sense of humor of the Creator.

Getting that information from the company, though, is nigh on impossible. I tried emailing the company and explaining this was for religious reasons and that I didn't want the recipe. I simply wanted to know why they added the flour, or even just the percentage. They eventually stopped answering my emails. Sigh...

This product is certified kosher by the O-U, so that was my next email. I went back and forth getting them the information they needed and then waited. Those cookies in my pantry, so tempting, but... 

Here was the answer: The ingredient list is: chocolate, coconut, flour, etc. However, the chocolate is not actually in the cookie, it is merely smeared as a thin layer on (the bottom of) the cookie. I hadn't thought about the implications of that detail. That means, though, that the cookie ingredients are: coconut, flour, etc. So flour is the second ingredient and the bracha בורא מיני מזונות.

That's the bracha rishona. What about the bracha acharona? To require an על המחיה, one needs to consume a k'zayis of flour in like 4 - 7 minutes. Since these cookies are small and the flour proportion also is relatively, eating two or three cookies is not enough to require an על המחיה. If you eat enough, probably with other things, then you would make a בורא נפשות.

I am so going to enjoy those cookies!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...