Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: We're Going to War -- Don't Be Afraid, But If You Are, Please Go Home

Near the end of parshas Shoftim (D'varim 20:1-9) we learn how Klal Yisrael went to war. I wrote about this in a TftD once before -- five years ago this week, in fact. There the discussion is about how sin affects us. This time I want to focus more on how we deal with sin.

The setup is well known. The War Kohein tells the troops that they should not be afraid; HaShem is fighting for them and they just need to have trust. Then he tells them that anyone who has a new house/vineyard/wife but has not yet experienced the fruits of his labor should go home lest he die in war and another takes his place. Then the War Kohein gives his final instruction: Anyone who is afraid should go home. On that, R' Akiva says it means what it says. R' Yossi says it means they have a sin in their hand and are therefore afraid. What is the Torah telling us with this speech and what do Chazal want us to learn from the divergent opinions of R' Akiva and R' Yossi?

Let us first have clarity that R' Akiva and R' Yossi both know very well -- and agree -- that the source of fear in war is a lack of faith that HaShem will save/protect you; as the world says, there are no atheists in a foxhole. On the flip side, both R' Akiva and R' Yossi know very well -- and agree -- that the root cause of that fear is sin. The difference may be someone who doesn't feel fear now, but knows he has sins for which he has not done t'shuva. R' Akiva would let him go to war; he doesn't feel that fear, so he will be able to concentrate on the battlefield and will not be a liability to the other troops. R' Yossi, though, feels that if one knows about his sin -- whether or not he feels fear now -- he needs to return home and not endanger the other troops. After all, on the verge of battle one is feeling many emotions and adrenal is high, this is not the time to try to make a rational choice based on feelings alone.

What about the juxtaposition of new house/vineyard/wife with fear? The famous answer that Rashi brings is that this juxtaposition saves the sinner from embarrassment. When people see him leaving, they won't know if it is because he is a sinner or a new home owner/vintner/husband. The Ramban (which I saw this morning and prompted this TftD), however, brings a Yerushalmi that says that just as one must bring witnesses to confirm his claim that he is a new home owner/vintner/husband, he would also need to bring witnesses that he is an unrepentant sinner. Pretty much the opposite of the Chazal that Rashi brings!

It may be that the two Chazals are presenting two ways for a person to deal with his trouble in extricating himself from the grip of sin. One is to realize that every sin committed by a frum Jew is, by its very definition, a chillul HaShem and therefore we need to work quietly and privately to do t'shuva. Another dimension, though, is to realize that the sin is certainly known and apparent; at least in front of the Holy One, Blessed be He. One therefore needs to feel a real urgency in doing t'shuva.

Given that this is an email (or you are reading my blog); so therefore using the internet in one form or another, I direct you to Guard Your Eyes via GYE Boost. Yes, this is an unsolicited advertisement for that amazing project. I invite you to check it out.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...