Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Separating from the Torah is Separating from Life

In a recent TftD, I wrote:

The Ramban doesn't explain what it means that "he caused death to himself". I have some thoughts about that, but I need to do some research before saying more.

 Well... I did more research and I found something really interesting. I learn mishnayos daily (a practice I started some years ago when I aked my rebbi, R' Dovid Siegel, shlita, for some counsel in what I should be learning. He started with, "Well... hmm... of course you are already learning mishnayos every day, so you are asking what else you should be learning." Yeah, well... I started that day to make his words true.) This year I decided to add the perush of the Bartenura. (No, that name is not Italian for "blue bottle".)  I just go in order, with an eye to making a siyum on the yahrtzeits of my father and my father-in-law. (They are far enough apart that it is doable with some juggling.) I am currently coming to the end of Seder Nezikin, and learning Pirkei Avos.

In the first mishna of the 5th chapter, we are informed that our reality was created with ten utterances. The mishna asks/states: But wouldn't one utterance have been enough? The mishna replies: This was to extract appropriate payment from evil doers who destroy the world that was created with ten utterances, and to properly reward the righteous who uphold/sustain the world that was created by ten utterances.

Says the Bartenura (in his first pshat): since anyone who destroys a single Jewish life is held accountable as if he destroyed a full world, and evil doers destroy themselves with their sins and it is therefore as if they have destroyed the entire world.

Wow. Not subtle at all. (Right up my alley....) Let's analyze. The way the Bartenura is explaining the mishna, it comes out that the entire creation is for this one Jewish soul. That means there is a nothing in the creation that is unnecessary for his life. (To paraphrase another mishna in pirkei avos.) Moreover, from the way the Bartenura explains what is happening, the term "evil doer" is not so much a description of that Jew, as it is description of a spiritual sickness. His "sinning" is cutting himself off from the very source of his life. We have 613 essential elements of our lives, and the mitzos connect us to the one and only source of nourishment for each and every one.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo