Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: When Halacha and Mussar Collide

This is just too, too delicious. Just a simple exchange between a gadol b'yisrael and his grandson -- also a talmid chacham of no small measure.

There are now (as of this writing) four volumes of מסורת משה -- halachic questions and discussions between R' Moshe Feinstein, ztz''l, and a grandson, R' Mordechai Tendler. Each night, the introduction explains, R' Tendler would record discussions/questions/interesting exchanges he had had that day with his zeidy. There are, apparently, many years worth of notebooks. They were originally intended as simply notes for himself. At some point, though, several of the other grandsons/grandsons-in-law wanted to arrange and edit those notes into a sefer. They consulted with R' Dovid Feinstein, ztz''l and he told them that he thought it would be a wonderful idea -- on one condition: They needed to have R' Shmuel Fuerst, shilta, review everything before it was published. R' Fuerst agreed and makes sure that all the entries are relevant to practical halacha and not narrow ruling based on some extenuating circumstances.

I spoke to R' Fuerst, shlita, when I saw his haskama and asked if it was fair for me to assume that anything I saw/read/learned in מסורת משה would have the same weight as calling the rabbi. R' Fuerst answered in the affirmative. I now, therefore, feel under no small obligation to learn the relevant מסורת משה entries before calling the rabbi.

So here is the story, which you can find in volume III of מסורת משה, siman 117, page 57. R' Tendler asked his zeidy as follows: Suppose someone is sitting down to eat a small amount of cake/cookie, in fact he plans to eat less than the שיעור/measure that would obligate him in a ברכה אחרונה. Is there any reason that one should not do that, but instead should be careful to eat enough cake/cookie so that he would, in fact, be obligated in making a ברכה אחרונה? R' Moshe answered that there most certainly were compelling reasons to eat a large enough שיעור to require a ברכה אחרונה. First, there is the opinion of the Maharsha that you need a שיעור  even for the ברכה ראשונה. Moreover, the actual שיעור of a כזית (k'zayis, literally "like (the size of) an olive", but Google translates as "a tiny amount") is actually quite small. We are stringent to eat a much larger שיעור to cover our bases, but it is very difficult to actually eat so little that a ברכה אחרונה is certainly not required. So, yes, concluded R' Moshe -- when ever eating a snack of cake/cookies, one should strive to eat enough to certainly require a  ברכה אחרונה.

R' Tendler thanked his zeidy, and then explained himself, "But I was asking from the mussar point of view; that is, should a person look at the eating as an opportunity to make a bracha and therefore eat an appropriate שיעור?

R' Moshe answered -- and I quote from the sefer -- שמא גם זה ענין/maybe that's also a good point.

Why do I like this story so much? First, this really reinforces that one needs to have a broad knowledge of halacha just to fulfill his obligation. Mussar is crucial, but many of us have a long way to go to simply fulfill our obligations before we even get to the point asking for extra credit. However, what really touched me about this story was that it just feels so real, so human; a zeidy with his grandson.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...